Wilson Whitaker Rynell

Experienced Lawyers

info@wwrlegal.com

a blue and orange check mark with the letter w on it as the Wilson Whitaker Rynell Logo
972-248-8080 DALLAS
713-830-2207 HOUSTON
512-691-4100 AUSTIN
wilson whitaker rynell attorneys and counselors at law logo
972-248-8080 DALLAS
713-830-2207 HOUSTON
512-691-4100 AUSTIN

PROPERTY LITIGATION ATTORNEYS

IN DALLAS FORT WORTH

Our experienced property litigation attorneys can represent you in real estate disputes, land boundary disputes, mechanics liens, and foreclosures.

LAND DISPUTES & REAL ESTATE LITIGATION

Real Estate and Commercial Land Disputes in Texas

With the increasingly complex real estate industry, realty disputes require real estate lawyers with knowledge at every degree and in all aspects of the industry. Whether resolving issues using mediation, arbitration, or litigation, the Dallas real estate attorneys at the Wilson Legal Group combine their expertise of law with their professional business aptitude to litigate for clients in all phases of the real estate business.  We represent developers, lenders, borrowers, REITs, landlords, tenants, brokers, partners, or members of partnerships. The firm has dealt extensively with real estate litigation and is proficient at representing clients in cases dealing with:

 

  • Boundary & Easement Disputes;

 

  • Closings & Document Preparation/Review;

 

  • Commercial Real Estate;

 

  • Condominiums & Homeowners' Associations;

 

  • Construction Disputes;

 

  • Contract Disputes, Enforcement, Formation & Litigation;

 

  • Credit Reporting Disputes & Rehabilitation;

 

  • Eminent Domain;

 

  • Evictions;

 

  • Foreclosures;

 

  • Housing Discrimination & Lender Red-Lining;

 

  • Landlord & Tenant Matters;

 

  • Lawsuits - Defense & Prosecution;

 

  • Mechanic’s Liens;

 

  • Mortgages & Lending Matters;

 

  • Purchase, Sale & Brokerage of Residences; and

 

  • Residential & Commercial Closings.


Judicial Foreclosure Process

Judicial foreclosure can be an option that a lienholder chooses to exercise despite being entitled to a non-judicial foreclosure, which is a faster and less expensive method of foreclosing real property liens. For example, a holder of a first lien deed of trust that provides for non-judicial foreclosure also has the option to file a lawsuit and request a judicial foreclosure. While filing suit for a judgment on the debt and foreclosure of real property does constitute an election of remedies, the election does not bar a non-judicial foreclosure proceeding until a judgment has been rendered for judicial foreclosure. Consequently, a lienholder can dismiss its judicial foreclosure proceeding before obtaining a judgment if the lien holder desires to seek non-judicial foreclosure of real property. Still a lienholder cannot concurrently pursue non-judicial foreclosure and a judicial foreclosure of the same property. Why would you choose the more expensive option of judicial foreclosure over a less costly and faster non-judicial foreclosure? 


Generally, there are three categories of reasons to choose a judicial foreclosure over a non-judicial foreclosure, these reasons are: 

 

  • Defective instruments; 

 

  • Defective title; and 

 

  • Litigious borrowers. 

 

Judicial foreclosures all but eliminate claims litigious borrowers can make against lien holders for wrongful foreclosure.


Dallas Real Property Litigation Lawyers


Our Dallas Real Property  litigation attorneys have earned a reputation for aggressive, responsive, efficient and, most importantly, successful actual property litigation. While we are prepared to take every case to trial, we know from our clients' perspective that often, the best litigation is the one that settles in mediation. Our straight forward unbiased guidance can help you avoid litigation whenever possible. However, if needed, our litigators are skilled in negotiation techniques and have a reputation for achieving very favorable results for our clients both in-court and out-of-court. 

a blue and orange check mark with the letter w on it as the WIlson Whitaker Rynell Logo

Additional Real Estate Litigation Focus 

Judicial Foreclosure Process in Texas


Jurisdiction & Venue: 

Petitions for judicial foreclosure must be filed in a District Court in (i) the county where the cause of action accrued, (ii) in the county of the defendant’s residence (if the defendant is an individual) or principal place of business (if the defendant is a corporation, partnership, unincorporated association, or other legal entity), (iii) in the county of plaintiff’s residence (if the plaintiff is an individual) or principal place of business (if the plaintiff is a corporation, partnership, unincorporated association, or other legal entity). Attorneys may be led to believe that the venue of a judicial foreclosure action must occur in the county in which the property is located. However, the Texas Supreme Court has held that an action to foreclose a lien does not primarily involve title to real property. Consequently, the venue is not mandatory in the county in which the land is located.


Pleadings Requirements:  

In order to obtain the relief of judicial foreclosure from a District Court, the lienholder must: (i) allege execution and delivery of a secured debt instrument, (ii) allege ownership of the debt instrument, (iii) provide a description of the property secured by the lien, (iv) allege the execution and delivery of the lien instrument (an exception is an abstract of judgment), (v) alleges the amount of the unpaid debt, and (vi) allege a default by the maker of the debt instrument. The prayer for relief in the petition should pray for the foreclosure of the lien along with a judgment against the debtor for the amount of the debt. The lienholder may recover attorneys fees are recovery of attorneys fees is provided for in the lien instrument and/or debt instrument, and pled for in the petition.


Foreclosure Judgement:  

A valid judgment foreclosing the lien must be obtained from the District Court, which should include: (i) an award of the debt owed to the lienholder, (ii) court costs and attorneys’ fees (if provided for in the lien or debt instrument), (iii) a decretal paragraph ordering the foreclosure of the lien, (iv) and a decretal paragraph directing a sheriff or constable to seize and sell the collateral of the lien in satisfaction of the debt, and (v) a decretal paragraph instructing the sheriff or constable that if the collateral does not sell for an amount sufficient to satisfy the debt that the sheriff or constable should proceed to execute on other property of the defendant as in ordinary judgment execution. Once a valid judgment foreclosing the lien has been entered by the District Court, a sale must be held in order to pass the title to a subsequent purchaser. The writ of sale should be directed to the sheriff or constable in the county in which the property is located. 


The Writ and Sale :  

The District Court clerk will issue the writ of sale upon the application of the successful party in a suit thirty (30) days after the judgment is rendered. The writ of sale must particularly describe the property and direct the sheriff to give public notice of the sale. The sale of the real property will be held at the courthouse door of the county unless the court orders that such sale shall be at the place where the real property is situated. The sale of the real property shall occur on the first Tuesday of the month, between the hours of ten o’clock, a.m. and four o’clock p.m. The sheriff must give notice of the sale in a newspaper in the county (in English) once a week for three consecutive weeks preceding the sale. The first of said notices must be published not less than twenty (20) days immediately preceding the day of sale. The notice must contain a statement of the authority by virtue of which the sale is to be made, the time of levy, the time and place of sale, a brief description of the property to be sold, the number of acres, the original survey, locality in the county, and the name by which the land is most generally known. Proceeds from the sale are applied first to the sheriff’s/constable’s cost of the sale, then to the indebtedness of the suit, and then to junior lienholders who were parties to the suit, and then the property owner.

CLIENT MATTERS


5,000+


YEARS OF SERVICE

 25+

Award Winning

Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.

Expert Team

Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you. 

Quality Representation

You’ll find the support you need to ensure that things run smoothly. We’re here to help with all your legal needs.

Meet Our Team

View All
A man riding a horse with a bull behind him
By John Wilson January 23, 2025
Understanding Writs of Execution in Texas: A Layperson’s Guide If a court determines that someone owes money to another party, the debtor—referred to as the "judgment debtor"—typically has 30 days to pay off the debt. If the debt remains unpaid after this time, the creditor, or "judgment creditor," can take legal action to enforce the payment through a Writ of Execution . This legal process, governed by Texas law, enables creditors to collect what they are owed by seizing and selling the debtor’s non-exempt assets. What Is a Writ of Execution? Under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 629 , a Writ of Execution is a court order that authorizes a sheriff or constable to seize the debtor’s property to satisfy the debt. This writ is an essential tool for creditors when voluntary repayment has not occurred. Once the writ is issued, it is handed over to a county constable or sheriff, who is required to act “without delay” in collecting the debtor’s real and personal property. The seized property is then sold, and the proceeds are used to pay off the debt. If multiple writs are filed against the same debtor, the assets are distributed in the order the writs were received. What Property Can Be Seized Under a Writ of Execution? Texas law is very specific about which types of property can and cannot be seized to satisfy a judgment. Exempt Property Certain assets are protected from seizure under Texas Property Code § 41.001. These include: The debtor’s homestead (primary residence) Wages earned from employment Professionally prescribed health aids Workers’ compensation benefits College savings plans Some insurance benefits Personal property valued up to $50,000 for individuals and $100,000 for families Unique to Texas, the law also protects items like family Bibles, two firearms, pets, and for rural residents, livestock (e.g., 12 head of cattle and 120 fowl). This extensive list reflects Texas's cultural heritage and values. Non-Exempt Property Assets that are generally not exempt include: Vacation homes Timeshares Pleasure boats Airplanes Jewelry exceeding certain value thresholds The specific procedures for seizing different types of property are detailed in Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 639 . Can a Writ of Execution Be Avoided? Judgment debtors have a few options to avoid the execution of a writ: Filing a Supersedeas Bond A supersedeas bond can temporarily halt enforcement of the writ. This bond, filed with the county clerk or justice of the peace, preserves the status quo while the debtor seeks further legal remedies. This option is governed by Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 634 . Challenging the Execution Debtors can file a claim for wrongful execution in situations such as: The debt has already been paid Exempt property is being seized The levy is excessive Additionally, courts take extra care to protect property classified as a homestead under Texas Property Code § 41.002(c) . When only one spouse is responsible for the debt, Texas Family Code § 3.202(a) and related provisions provide guidance on levying against community or separate property. The Role of County Officials in Executing the Writ Once the writ is issued, its enforcement falls on county officials, typically a sheriff or constable. These officials must act in accordance with Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , which requires them to execute the writ and report back to the court. They must: Give proper notice of the sale of seized property Ensure the proceeds are appropriately delivered to the creditor Avoid overstepping legal boundaries, such as seizing exempt property Failing to execute the writ properly can result in serious consequences, where a sheriff’s refusal to levy on a property initially listed as exempt (but later deemed abandoned) led to court action and damages awarded to the creditor. Preventing Fraudulent Transfers One challenge creditors face is when debtors attempt to hide or transfer assets to avoid collection. To address this, Texas follows the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act under Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code § 24.001 et seq .. This act provides legal remedies to creditors when a debtor’s transfer of assets is deemed fraudulent. Effect of a Defendant's Death on Writs of Execution Under Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , the death of a defendant after a writ of execution is issued halts execution proceedings. However, any lien acquired from the writ's levy is still enforceable by the county court when paying off the deceased's debts. Why Proper Execution Of The Writ Is Crucial The rules for filing and serving a Writ of Execution are strict and detailed. Missteps, such as filing the writ in the wrong county, failing to serve the proper parties, or missing key deadlines, can lead to delays or even render the writ ineffective. Both creditors and debtors must ensure compliance with these rules to avoid unnecessary complications. For creditors, failure to properly enforce the writ could mean losing the opportunity to collect on a judgment. For debtors, not responding appropriately to a writ could result in the loss of valuable assets, even those that might have been exempt.
A sign that says jct 17 texas on it
By John Wilson January 17, 2025
Understanding Venue Selection and Motions to Dismiss in Texas Civil Litigation
A man and a woman are holding a sign that says `` our first home ''.
By John Wilson January 17, 2025
Wraparound Mortgages in Texas and The Pros and Cons of Seller Financing
Show More
Share by: