In Texas civil litigation, two essential concepts can often shape the course of a lawsuit: venue selection and motions to dismiss. Both ensure cases are handled in the proper location and that baseless claims are addressed efficiently.
The venue refers to the specific geographic location where a lawsuit is filed and heard. Selecting the appropriate venue is essential, as it impacts the convenience for all parties involved, the applicability of local laws, and the fairness of the proceedings. Texas law provides clear guidelines for determining venue, starting with the general rule outlined in Section 15.002 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. According to this rule, a lawsuit should be filed in the county where the events leading to the claim occurred, where the defendant lives (if they’re an individual), or where the defendant’s principal office is located (if it’s a business). If none of these apply, the case can be filed in the plaintiff’s county of residence.
In addition to general rules, Texas law outlines specific circumstances where mandatory venue provisions apply. These provisions override general venue rules to address particular policy considerations. Common examples include:
Contracts often include venue agreements where the parties decide in advance where any disputes will be resolved. In Texas, these agreements are generally enforceable, especially in high-value contracts involving $1 million or more. Such agreements allow parties to choose a venue that suits their needs, reducing uncertainty in case of a dispute. If a lawsuit is filed in the wrong venue, the defendant can challenge it by filing a motion to transfer venue. This motion must explain why the current venue is improper and identify the correct venue. It’s important to file this motion early—usually before responding to the lawsuit in any other way—because failing to do so might waive the right to object.
In cases where multiple lawsuits about the same matter are filed in different counties, Texas follows the “first-to-file” rule under the doctrine of dominant jurisdiction. This means the court where the case was first filed typically takes precedence, and other courts may transfer or pause their proceedings to avoid duplicating efforts.
Texas law provides specific rules for determining venue in legal disputes arising from major transactions. Here’s a breakdown of what you need to know:
A major transaction is defined as a written agreement where a person is required to pay or entitled to receive at least $1 million in total value. However, transactions primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, as well as those related to personal injury or wrongful death claims, are not included in this definition—regardless of the amount involved. For businesses or individuals involved in transactions exceeding $1 million, understanding venue agreements is crucial to ensure compliance with Texas law. Always carefully review and negotiate venue clauses in contracts, as they can directly impact where legal disputes may be resolved.
A legal action tied to a major transaction must be filed in a county where the opposing party has agreed in writing to allow such a lawsuit.
An action cannot be brought in a county if the party filing the lawsuit has previously agreed in writing:
Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code - CIV PRAC & REM § 15.020 does not apply if:
If the transaction doesn’t meet the criteria of a major transaction, these venue rules do not apply. In such cases, other venue and jurisdiction rules in Texas will dictate where the lawsuit can be filed.
Motions to Dismiss are another tool used in civil litigation. They’re used to eliminate claims that are legally or factually baseless, streamlining the legal process and saving time and resources for everyone involved. In Texas, Rule 91a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides a straightforward process for dismissing baseless claims. A motion to dismiss under Rule 91a can be filed when a claim has no legal or factual basis. A claim lacks a legal basis if, even assuming all the facts in the lawsuit are true, the law doesn’t support the plaintiff’s request for relief. A claim has no factual basis if no reasonable person could believe the facts presented. This rule allows courts to focus on claims with merit and dismiss those that are frivolous.
There are specific steps and timelines to follow when filing a motion to dismiss. The process ensures that the matter is addressed efficiently and within a reasonable timeframe:
The purpose of these procedural rules is to help courts manage their caseloads efficiently and protect defendants from the costs and burdens of defending against baseless claims.
In Texas, it’s not unusual for parties in a lawsuit to file claims against each other in different counties, each hoping to gain the upper hand by picking a favorable venue. This scenario, often called "the race to the courthouse," underscores the importance of the doctrine of dominant jurisdiction. Essentially, the court that gets jurisdiction over the case first is given priority. In these situations, the second court will typically dismiss, transfer, or put the case on hold to let the first court handle it. If you’re involved in a venue dispute between counties in Texas, filing first can make all the difference.
While the doctrine of dominant jurisdiction tends to favor whoever files first, there’s another way to challenge venue: the principle of forum non conveniens. This legal tool allows defendants to argue that the chosen venue, though technically valid, is so inconvenient that it would be unfair to continue the case there.To pursue this, a defendant can file a motion to stay or dismiss the case on the grounds that the forum is not convenient. But keep in mind, Texas courts don’t easily override the plaintiff’s venue choice. The burden is on the defendant to meet a high standard.
Under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 71.051(b), courts look at several factors when deciding whether to grant a motion for forum non conveniens:
When it comes to Texas lawsuits, understanding dominant jurisdiction and forum non conveniens is essential. Acting quickly to file your case can give you the advantage of controlling the venue. On the other hand, if you’re a defendant facing an inconvenient venue, knowing how to effectively challenge it can help ensure your case is heard in a fair and appropriate forum.
A major transaction in Texas is defined as any written agreement where the total value of the consideration paid or received is at least $1 million. However, this does not include agreements primarily for personal, family, or household purposes or those related to settling personal injury or wrongful death claims.
Yes, but only if the opposing party has agreed in writing to allow the lawsuit to be filed in the selected county. If there is a written agreement specifying a different venue, you must adhere to that agreement unless it is found to be unconscionable or voidable under Texas law.
No. A lawsuit cannot be filed in a county if the party bringing the action previously agreed in writing:
The venue rules for major transactions do not apply if:
No, these rules specifically apply to major transactions where the value is at least $1 million. For smaller transactions, other venue and jurisdiction rules in Texas will determine where legal actions can be filed.
In Texas, the venue is typically determined based on the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 15.002. A lawsuit should be filed in the county where:
Certain types of cases in Texas are subject to mandatory venue provisions, which override general venue rules. Examples include:
The “first-to-file” rule, based on the doctrine of dominant jurisdiction, gives priority to the court where a case about the same matter was first filed. If multiple lawsuits about the same issue are filed in different counties, the court handling the first case typically takes precedence. Other courts may transfer or pause their proceedings to avoid duplicating efforts.
Have an idea for a blog? Click and request a blog and we will let you know when we post it!
Let's talk about your legal issue
Wilson Legal Group P.C.
d/b/a Wilson Whitaker Rynell
(972) 248-8080 (Dallas) MAIN OFFICE
(713) 830-2207 (Houston) Appointment Only
(512) 691-4100 (Austin) Appointment Only
For more information on how we can assist in your intellectual property, commercial litigation, divorce, or other personal needs, let us know how we can help you:
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Thank You for Contacting Us!
Your information has been sent, and we will contact you shorlty...issues.
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Oops, there was an error sending your message.
Please try again later.
Disclaimer:
This form does not establish an attorney-client relationship, and should only be used to contact the firm about scheduling a call or meeting. No confidential or sensitive information should be sent using this form.
We represent clients nationwide, including Dallas, Austin, Houston, and other Texas areas such as Fort Worth, Arlington, Carrollton, Plano, Allen, Lewisville, Flower Mound, Irving, Denton, McKinney, North Richland Hills, and all cities within Dallas County, Tarrant County, Collin County, and Denton County.
Wilson Whitaker Rynell
16610 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75248
972-248-8080 (MAIN)
972-248-8088 (FAX)
info@wrrlegal.com (E-MAIL)