Wilson Whitaker Rynell

Experienced Lawyers

info@wwrlegal.com

a blue and orange check mark with the letter w on it as the Wilson Whitaker Rynell Logo
972-248-8080 DALLAS
713-830-2207 HOUSTON
512-691-4100 AUSTIN
wilson whitaker rynell attorneys and counselors at law logo
972-248-8080 DALLAS
713-830-2207 HOUSTON
512-691-4100 AUSTIN

UNFAIR COMPETITION LITIGATORS

Dallas, Texas

Our industry-experienced litigation attorneys prosecute and defend unfair competition to protect your business strategies & trade secrets from misappropriation.

UNFAIR COMPETITION LAWSUITS

What is Unfair Competition?

Unfair competition is a commercial tort and umbrella category for a wide range of distinct business torts, from trademark infringement to trade secret infringement.  When Congress passed the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914, it considered and rejected the idea that an enumerated list of unfair practices must be created to reduce the ambiguity of the phrase “unfair methods of competition.” Congress stated that: " It is impossible to frame definitions which embrace all unfair practices. There is no limit to human inventiveness in this field. Even if all known unfair practices were specifically defined and prohibited, it would be at once necessary to begin all over again. If Congress were to adopt the method of definition, it would undertake an endless task."  In other words, people will always come up with new and novel ways to unfairly compete with each other. It is not in the best interest of society to even attempt to identify every conceivable manner by which they will unfairly compete.


Th us, the Courts have broad discretion in uncovering new unfair competitions in ever potential litigation.  Presently, the unfair competition had been held by Courts to include the following types of actions:

 

  • Infringement of trademarks and service marks;

 

  • Dilution of trademarks;

 

  • “Palming off” goods by unauthorized substitution of one brand for the brand ordered;

 

  • Use of confusingly similar corporate, business, and professional names;

 

  • Use of confusingly similar titles of creative works, movies and TV programs, and on commercial goods;

 

  • Confusing use of names and images of distinctive characters;

 

  • Infringement of trade dress in the distinctive configuration of packaging or product;

 

  • Infringement of the right of publicity;

 

  •  Misappropriation of valuable and time-critical business information;

 

  • “Bait and switch” selling tactics; 

 

  • False advertising;

 

  • Theft of trade secrets;

 

  • Filing a groundless lawsuit or administrative challenge as an aggressive competitive weapon;

 

  • Sending cease and desist letters charging infringement of “patent rights” before any patent has been granted;

 

  • Sending cease and desist letters to alleged infringers or to customers of a competitor charging patent infringement without having a reasonable basis for a belief that there was infringement;

 

  • Sending bad faith cease and desist letters to plaintiff's customers, charging copyright infringement;

 

  • An unreasonable rejection of goods shipped under contract and ordering services without intending to pay for them; and

 

  • Physically obstructing the entrance to a competitor's place of business and harassing its customers.

 

When is Palming Off Products an Unfair Competition? 

Unfair competition can occur when a business entity “palms off” its products as those of another; however, the determinative question is whether  those practices are likely to mislead customers into believing that the product emanates from or has been endorsed by the claimant. The test is a likelihood of confusion. Passing off is actionable under the Lanham Act.


Dallas Trademark Litigation Lawyers

Our Dallas unfair competition litigation attorneys have earned a reputation for aggressive, responsive, efficient, and most importantly, successful unfair competition litigation. While we are prepared to take every case to trial, we know from our clients' perspective that often, the best litigation is the one that settles in mediation. Our straight forward unbiased guidance can help you avoid litigation whenever possible. However, if needed, our litigators are skilled in negotiation techniques and have a reputation for achieving very favorable results for our clients both in-court and out-of-court. 

a blue and orange check mark with the letter w on it as the Wilson Legal Group Logo

Additional Unfair Competition Litigation Focus 

Proving Common-Law Misappropriation & Use

To prove unfair competition by common law misappropriation, the following requirements must be met:

 

  • The creation of the plaintiff's product (i.e., the trade secret information) through extensive time, labor, skill, and money; 

 

  • The defendant's use of the product in competition with the plaintiff gains a special advantage in that competition because the defendant is burdened with little or none of the expense incurred by the plaintiff; and

 

  • Commercial damage to the plaintiff. 

 

A defendant's unfair gain or special advantage is often called a "free ride."  Further, a claim for unfair competition by misappropriation and use does not require proof of secrecy.  Also, while there is an overlap between federal laws, such as Copyright Litigation , common law misappropriation covers products that may not be protectable by other statutory intellectual property laws.


What is Misappropriation of a Trade Secret?


Misappropriation of trade secrets is a common-law tort cause of action. Proving a misappropriation of trade secrets requires the following (See Trade Secret Litigation for more information):

 

  • Existence of a trade secret; 

 

  • Breach of a confidential relationship or improper acquiring of a trade secret; 

 

  • Use of the trade secret; and 

 

  • Damages. 

CLIENT MATTERS


5,000+


YEARS OF SERVICE

 25+

Award Winning

Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.

Expert Team

Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you. 

Quality Representation

You’ll find the support you need to ensure that things run smoothly. We’re here to help with all your legal needs.

Meet Our Team

View All
A building with a sign that says law offices on it
By John Wilson February 12, 2025
Strategic Legal Representation for Complex Business Litigation
A man riding a horse with a bull behind him
By John Wilson January 23, 2025
Understanding Writs of Execution in Texas: A Layperson’s Guide If a court determines that someone owes money to another party, the debtor—referred to as the "judgment debtor"—typically has 30 days to pay off the debt. If the debt remains unpaid after this time, the creditor, or "judgment creditor," can take legal action to enforce the payment through a Writ of Execution . This legal process, governed by Texas law, enables creditors to collect what they are owed by seizing and selling the debtor’s non-exempt assets. What Is a Writ of Execution? Under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 629 , a Writ of Execution is a court order that authorizes a sheriff or constable to seize the debtor’s property to satisfy the debt. This writ is an essential tool for creditors when voluntary repayment has not occurred. Once the writ is issued, it is handed over to a county constable or sheriff, who is required to act “without delay” in collecting the debtor’s real and personal property. The seized property is then sold, and the proceeds are used to pay off the debt. If multiple writs are filed against the same debtor, the assets are distributed in the order the writs were received. What Property Can Be Seized Under a Writ of Execution? Texas law is very specific about which types of property can and cannot be seized to satisfy a judgment. Exempt Property Certain assets are protected from seizure under Texas Property Code § 41.001. These include: The debtor’s homestead (primary residence) Wages earned from employment Professionally prescribed health aids Workers’ compensation benefits College savings plans Some insurance benefits Personal property valued up to $50,000 for individuals and $100,000 for families Unique to Texas, the law also protects items like family Bibles, two firearms, pets, and for rural residents, livestock (e.g., 12 head of cattle and 120 fowl). This extensive list reflects Texas's cultural heritage and values. Non-Exempt Property Assets that are generally not exempt include: Vacation homes Timeshares Pleasure boats Airplanes Jewelry exceeding certain value thresholds The specific procedures for seizing different types of property are detailed in Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 639 . Can a Writ of Execution Be Avoided? Judgment debtors have a few options to avoid the execution of a writ: Filing a Supersedeas Bond A supersedeas bond can temporarily halt enforcement of the writ. This bond, filed with the county clerk or justice of the peace, preserves the status quo while the debtor seeks further legal remedies. This option is governed by Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 634 . Challenging the Execution Debtors can file a claim for wrongful execution in situations such as: The debt has already been paid Exempt property is being seized The levy is excessive Additionally, courts take extra care to protect property classified as a homestead under Texas Property Code § 41.002(c) . When only one spouse is responsible for the debt, Texas Family Code § 3.202(a) and related provisions provide guidance on levying against community or separate property. The Role of County Officials in Executing the Writ Once the writ is issued, its enforcement falls on county officials, typically a sheriff or constable. These officials must act in accordance with Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , which requires them to execute the writ and report back to the court. They must: Give proper notice of the sale of seized property Ensure the proceeds are appropriately delivered to the creditor Avoid overstepping legal boundaries, such as seizing exempt property Failing to execute the writ properly can result in serious consequences, where a sheriff’s refusal to levy on a property initially listed as exempt (but later deemed abandoned) led to court action and damages awarded to the creditor. Preventing Fraudulent Transfers One challenge creditors face is when debtors attempt to hide or transfer assets to avoid collection. To address this, Texas follows the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act under Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code § 24.001 et seq .. This act provides legal remedies to creditors when a debtor’s transfer of assets is deemed fraudulent. Effect of a Defendant's Death on Writs of Execution Under Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , the death of a defendant after a writ of execution is issued halts execution proceedings. However, any lien acquired from the writ's levy is still enforceable by the county court when paying off the deceased's debts. Why Proper Execution Of The Writ Is Crucial The rules for filing and serving a Writ of Execution are strict and detailed. Missteps, such as filing the writ in the wrong county, failing to serve the proper parties, or missing key deadlines, can lead to delays or even render the writ ineffective. Both creditors and debtors must ensure compliance with these rules to avoid unnecessary complications. For creditors, failure to properly enforce the writ could mean losing the opportunity to collect on a judgment. For debtors, not responding appropriately to a writ could result in the loss of valuable assets, even those that might have been exempt.
A sign that says jct 17 texas on it
By John Wilson January 17, 2025
Understanding Venue Selection and Motions to Dismiss in Texas Civil Litigation
Show More
Share by: