The Standing Requirement for Oppositions and Cancellation Proceedings
ATTORNEYS IN DALLAS
Understand the importance of standing in an Opposition or Cancellation proceeding and the legal basis for standing under Sections 13 and 14 of the Lanham Act.
The Standing Requirement for Oppositions and Cancellation Proceedings
In order to initiate an Opposition or Cancellation proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (referred to as the "Board"), the party commencing the action must establish standing. This means that the party acting as the plaintiff must have a personal interest in the outcome of the Opposition or Cancellation proceeding. The legal basis for standing in an Opposition or Cancellation can be found in Sections 13 and 14 of the Lanham Act, respectively. The party in the plaintiff's position must have a personal stake in the proceeding and a reasonable belief that they will suffer harm.
If the party initiating the action asserts likelihood of confusion as a ground to oppose or cancel the mark, there is no requirement to plead and prove actual damages to satisfy the standing requirement. It is sufficient if the Opposer's belief in likelihood of confusion is not entirely baseless. The statute is interpreted liberally, particularly in cases where the Opposer alleges non-use abandonment of the mark. Bringing proceedings based on non-use serves the public interest by removing inactive marks from the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") Register, thereby enhancing the reliability of trademark searches.
If the ground asserted in a Board proceeding is that the mark is merely descriptive or generic of the applicant's goods or services, it is enough for the Opposer to show that they are either a competitor of the Applicant or that they may use the term to describe their similar goods or services. The Opposer does not need to have a proprietary right or ownership interest in the mark to have standing in an Opposition based on false suggestion of a connection (Section 2(a)) or likelihood of confusion (Section 2(d)), as long as the Opposer has a genuine interest in the outcome of the proceeding. This genuine interest may include efforts to prevent public deception or harm to a specific trade association and its members. In different circumstances, if the party asserts fraud or abandonment as grounds to oppose or cancel a mark, it is sufficient if the Opposer or Petitioner is in a position to use the subject mark for similar goods or services as the Applicant or Registrant.
According to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 8(e)(2), an Opposer has the option to present alternative legal theories to prevent the mark from registering. A party can assert as many separate claims or defenses as they have, regardless of consistency. See Taffy's of Cleveland, Inc. v. Taffy's, Inc., 189 USPQ 154 (TTAB 1975). For instance, if the Examining Attorney rejects an application based on likelihood of confusion with a prior registered mark, the Applicant is allowed to argue against the refusal by claiming that confusion is unlikely. If the Applicant fails to convince the Examiner, they may then initiate a Cancellation proceeding (assuming they have prior use of the mark) and assert likelihood of confusion as the ground, even though the two positions are contradictory.
The rationale behind permitting inconsistent pleadings is that any statement made by an applicant in an ex parte proceeding to overcome an objection cannot prevent the party from taking a different position in a matter before the Board. However, it is worth noting that under certain circumstances, an applicant's statement in an ex parte proceeding may be considered an admission against interest in a subsequent proceeding.
Once standing is established, any ground for opposition is permissible if it would invalidate the Applicant's right to register the mark. The Opposer bears the burden of proving their case by a preponderance of the evidence, unless the application involves a claim of acquired distinctiveness. In such cases, the Applicant acknowledges that the mark is descriptive and therefore cannot be registered unless secondary meaning is demonstrated.
Contact an Experienced Trademark Attorney
If you need legal advice regarding your trademark rights, assistance with trademark prosecution, or representation in a domain name dispute, contact Wilson Whitaker Rynell. Our team of trademark lawyers has extensive experience in all aspects of trademark and copyright law, including the filing of trademark applications and representing clients in defense or prosecution before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
- 66(a) Applications
- Abandoning a Trademark Application or Withdrawing a TTAB Proceeding
- Abandonment and Nonuse
- Abbreviations as Trademarks
- Accelerated Case Resolutions
- Acquired Secondary Trademark Meaning
- Amending Trademark Application
- Assigning a Trademark
- Assigning a Trademark and the Intent to Use Application
- Avoiding Fraud on Trademark Applications
- Avoiding Trademark Litigation
- Basis for Filing a Trademark
- Benefits of Registering a Trademark
- Bona Fide Intent to Use
- Celebrity Trademarks
- Challenging the Relatedness Factor
- Challenging Trademark Rights
- Claims in a Notice of Opposition
- Co-Existence Agreements
- Common Law Trademarks in the Internet Era
- Common Law Use and Priority
- Conflicting Marks
- Consent Agreements
- Constructive Use Priority
- Dates of Use
- Defenses in Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
- Descriptive or Generic Trademarks
- Design Marks
- Design Trademarks
- Determining Trademark Similarities
- Discovery in TTAB Proceedings
- Dividing a Trademark Application
- Drawing Page
- Electronic Display Specimens for Trademarks
- Evidence in TTAB Proceedings
- Evidence of Acquired Distinctiveness
- Expediting Trademark Cancellation for Nonuse or Abandonment
- Extending Time to Oppose
- Factors of a Likelihood of Confusion Analysis
- False Suggestions of Connection
- Famous Trademarks and Likelihood of Confusion and Dilution
- Filing an Opposition or Cancellation Proceedings
- First Sale Doctrine
- Five Years of Use
- Foreign Trademark Rights
- Generic Trademarks
- Geographic Trademarks
- Hiring Trademark Counsel
- Immoral and Scandalous Trademarks
- Incontestability of U.S. Trademarks
- International Trademark Filings
- Joint Trademark Ownership
- Lawful Use of a Trademark in Commerce
- Likelihood of Confusion Analysis
- Likelihood of Confusion Refusal
- Merely Descriptive Trademarks
- Multiple Bases for a Trademark Application
- Overcoming and Ornamentation Trademark Refusal
- Personal Name Trademarks
- Principal and Supplemental Registers
- Protecting Single Creative Works
- Recording Trademark Assignments
- Refusal of a Trademark
- Refusing a Trade Dress Application
- Registering a Certification Trademark
- Registering a Service Mark
- Registering a Trademark That Lacks Inherent Distinctiveness
- Registering an International Trademark
- Relatedness of Goods or Services
- Request for Reconsideration in Trademark Office Action
- Requirements for International Trademark Application
- Revive an Abandoned Trademark Application
- Secondary Meaning
- Source Confusion
- Special Trademark Applications
- Standard Character and Special Format Marks
- Standing in Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
- State Trademark Registration
- Statement of Use Extensions
- Tacking Doctrine
- Technical Trademark Use
- The Supplemental Register
- Trade Dress
- Trade Dress Application
- Trademark Application
- Trademark Clearance Searches
- Trademark Disclaimers
- Trademark Licensing
- Trademark of Authors, Performing Artists, and Characters
- Trademark Ownership
- Trademark Protection In Texas
- Trademark Settlements
- Trademark Specimens
- Trademark Specimens
- Trademark Use by Related Company
- Trademark Use in Advertising
- Trademark Use in Commerce
- Trademarking a Distinctive Mark
- Trademarking a Hashtag
- Trademarks for Musical Artists
- TTAB Discovery Rules
- TTAB Proceedings
- U.S. Service Mark
- U.S. Trade Dress
- Understanding Trade Channels
- Unitary U.S. Trademark
- Universal Symbols as Trademarks
- Using Secondary Sources
- What is an Ex Parte Appeal?
- Where to Register a Trademark
- Who Must File a Trademark?
CLIENT MATTERS
5,000+
YEARS OF SERVICE
25+
Award Winning
Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.
Expert Team
Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you.
Quality Representation
