Determining priority of use is often a critical factor in trademark cases. It's important to note that using a trademark in a foreign country does not automatically confer rights in the United States. This rule is rooted in the principle of territoriality, which is fundamental to trademark law. Each country has its own laws governing trademark rights. For reference, the case of Person's Co. Ltd. v. Christman, 900 F.2d 1565, 14 USPQ2d 1477 (Fed. Cir. 1990) provides insights into this matter.
However, it is possible to establish priority rights in a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceeding through Section 44 of the Lanham Act. This can be done by either filing a trademark application or obtaining a registration in a qualified foreign country. A qualified country refers to a nation that is a party to a treaty with the United States, granting priority rights or reciprocal rights to U.S. nationals. If an applicant files a trademark application in a qualified foreign country within six months of filing in the USPTO, they can claim a priority right dating back to the foreign filing date.
In simpler terms, if a trademark applicant first files in a foreign country and then applies to the USPTO within six months, they can establish a priority right starting from the foreign filing date. This foreign filing date is treated as the constructive use date for an intent-to-use application under Section 7(c) of the Lanham Act. Both the foreign filing date and the intent-to-use application date can be used to prove priority rights.
However, it is important to note that to obtain a U.S. registration from the USPTO, the applicant must fulfill the requirements of the Trademark Act. This includes demonstrating use in commerce under Section 1(a), bona fide use in commerce under Section 1(b), or issuance of a registration in the applicant's country of origin under Section 44(e). It is worth mentioning that the foreign application filed does not necessarily have to be from the applicant's country of origin. The country of origin is defined by Section 44(c) of the Trademark Act as the country where the applicant has a genuine and effective industrial or commercial establishment. If no establishment exists, the country of origin is determined based on the applicant's domicile or nationality. It's important to keep in mind that an applicant may have more than one country of origin.
If a party has obtained a foreign trademark registration in their country of origin, it is advisable to file their trademark application under Section 44(e) of the Trademark Act. Unlike other sections, there is no six-month time limit for filing in this case. When applying under Section 44(e), the applicant is not obligated to claim prior use of the mark in the United States or provide supporting specimens. By filing under Section 44(e) of the Trademark Act, the applicant is granted the privilege of using the filing date as a constructive use date, irrespective of when actual use of the mark begins in the United States.
An international application or a subsequent designation made after the International Bureau registers the trademark can include a Request for extension of protection to the United States. When such an application is filed, it is known as a Section 66(a) application. For a party filing a 66(a) application, the constructive use date is determined based on the earliest of the following events: (1) the international registration date; (2) the date when the Bureau recorded the subsequent designation for the request for extension to the U.S. (if the request was made after the international registration date); or (3) the date of priority claimed in accordance with Lanham Act §67. However, it's important to note that constructive use is contingent upon the registration of the mark on the Principal Register of the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
Getting in touch is easy. Use the form below and request a free consultation today.
If you need legal advice regarding your trademark rights, assistance with trademark prosecution, or representation in a domain name dispute, contact Wilson Whitaker Rynell. Our team of trademark lawyers has extensive experience in all aspects of trademark and copyright law, including the filing of trademark applications and representing clients in defense or prosecution before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.
Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you.
Let's talk about your legal issue
Wilson Legal Group P.C.
d/b/a Wilson Whitaker Rynell
(972) 248-8080 (Dallas) MAIN OFFICE
(713) 830-2207 (Houston) Appointment Only
(512) 691-4100 (Austin) Appointment Only
For more information on how we can assist in your intellectual property, commercial litigation, divorce, or other personal needs, let us know how we can help you:
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Thank You for Contacting Us!
Your information has been sent, and we will contact you shorlty...issues.
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Oops, there was an error sending your message.
Please try again later.
Disclaimer:
This form does not establish an attorney-client relationship, and should only be used to contact the firm about scheduling a call or meeting. No confidential or sensitive information should be sent using this form.
We represent clients nationwide, including Dallas, Austin, Houston, and other Texas areas such as Fort Worth, Arlington, Carrollton, Plano, Allen, Lewisville, Flower Mound, Irving, Denton, McKinney, North Richland Hills, and all cities within Dallas County, Tarrant County, Collin County, and Denton County.
Wilson Whitaker Rynell
16610 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75248
972-248-8080 (MAIN)
972-248-8088 (FAX)
info@wrrlegal.com (E-MAIL)