Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings - Defenses
ATTORNEYS IN DALLAS
Initiate effective proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board by understanding the various defenses available to invalidate a trademark application to ensure a comprehensive and strategic approach to trademark disputes.
Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings - Defenses
If a party has reason to believe that a trademark application should not be approved or that a registered trademark should be invalidated, they can initiate a proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). The party can file a Notice of Opposition or a Petition to Cancel, which are similar to a Complaint in a civil litigation. In response, the defendant can file an Answer.
The Lanham Act allows the defendant to raise equitable defenses in all inter partes proceedings. In addition to equitable defenses, various other defenses can be raised in the Answer. Some affirmative defenses include: (1) unclean hands; (2) laches; (3) estoppel; (4) acquiescence; (5) fraud; (6) mistake; (7) prior judgment; (8) third parties using similar marks for similar goods, thus weakening the mark's protection; or (9) any other matter that serves as an avoidance. These affirmative defenses should be asserted in the Answer. The Board may disregard a defense that was not raised in a timely manner. An Answer can include any defense.
No response is required for an affirmative defense, but a response is necessary for a counterclaim.
Defenses to Fraud and Laches in Trademark Cases
Certain defenses have specific rules to consider. In cases involving fraud, the circumstances of the fraud must be stated with specificity and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must be followed. Regarding laches, the defense in TTAB proceedings must be connected to the party's registration of a trademark, not the use of a mark. The elements of laches include (1) an unreasonable delay in asserting a party's rights against another and (2) material prejudice to another resulting from that delay. Prejudice can be shown through loss of evidence or witnesses' memories due to the delay, as well as economic prejudice. Laches does not apply in certain circumstances, such as cases where confusion is inevitable, or when the grounds alleged involve genericness, mere descriptiveness, fraud, abandonment, or deceptive or deceptively misdescriptive marks.
The Defense of Trademark Acquiescence
The defense of acquiescence is similar to laches, with laches being passive assent and acquiescence being active assent. To prove acquiescence, one must demonstrate behavior that indicates apparent consent to the registration of the mark. Like laches, acquiescence is also tied to the registration of the mark, not its use, and does not apply under certain circumstances outlined earlier. The prior registration defense, also known as the Morehouse defense, is a relatively new defense. If an applicant has registered a substantially identical or identical mark for the same or substantially similar goods, the opposition or cancellation will be dismissed because no further harm can be caused to the plaintiff. However, there are exceptions when the prior registration defense does not apply, similar to laches and acquiescence defenses mentioned earlier.
Contact an Experienced Trademark Attorney
If you need legal advice regarding your trademark rights, assistance with trademark prosecution, or representation in a domain name dispute, contact Wilson Whitaker Rynell. Our team of trademark lawyers has extensive experience in all aspects of trademark and copyright law, including the filing of trademark applications and representing clients in defense or prosecution before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
- 66(a) Applications
- Abandoning a Trademark Application or Withdrawing a TTAB Proceeding
- Abandonment and Nonuse
- Abbreviations as Trademarks
- Accelerated Case Resolutions
- Acquired Secondary Trademark Meaning
- Amending Trademark Application
- Assigning a Trademark
- Assigning a Trademark and the Intent to Use Application
- Avoiding Fraud on Trademark Applications
- Avoiding Trademark Litigation
- Basis for Filing a Trademark
- Benefits of Registering a Trademark
- Bona Fide Intent to Use
- Celebrity Trademarks
- Challenging the Relatedness Factor
- Challenging Trademark Rights
- Claims in a Notice of Opposition
- Co-Existence Agreements
- Common Law Trademarks in the Internet Era
- Common Law Use and Priority
- Conflicting Marks
- Consent Agreements
- Constructive Use Priority
- Dates of Use
- Defenses in Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
- Descriptive or Generic Trademarks
- Design Marks
- Design Trademarks
- Determining Trademark Similarities
- Discovery in TTAB Proceedings
- Dividing a Trademark Application
- Drawing Page
- Electronic Display Specimens for Trademarks
- Evidence in TTAB Proceedings
- Evidence of Acquired Distinctiveness
- Expediting Trademark Cancellation for Nonuse or Abandonment
- Extending Time to Oppose
- Factors of a Likelihood of Confusion Analysis
- False Suggestions of Connection
- Famous Trademarks and Likelihood of Confusion and Dilution
- Filing an Opposition or Cancellation Proceedings
- First Sale Doctrine
- Five Years of Use
- Foreign Trademark Rights
- Generic Trademarks
- Geographic Trademarks
- Hiring Trademark Counsel
- Immoral and Scandalous Trademarks
- Incontestability of U.S. Trademarks
- International Trademark Filings
- Joint Trademark Ownership
- Lawful Use of a Trademark in Commerce
- Likelihood of Confusion Analysis
- Likelihood of Confusion Refusal
- Merely Descriptive Trademarks
- Multiple Bases for a Trademark Application
- Overcoming and Ornamentation Trademark Refusal
- Personal Name Trademarks
- Principal and Supplemental Registers
- Protecting Single Creative Works
- Recording Trademark Assignments
- Refusal of a Trademark
- Refusing a Trade Dress Application
- Registering a Certification Trademark
- Registering a Service Mark
- Registering a Trademark That Lacks Inherent Distinctiveness
- Registering an International Trademark
- Relatedness of Goods or Services
- Request for Reconsideration in Trademark Office Action
- Requirements for International Trademark Application
- Revive an Abandoned Trademark Application
- Secondary Meaning
- Source Confusion
- Special Trademark Applications
- Standard Character and Special Format Marks
- Standing in Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
- State Trademark Registration
- Statement of Use Extensions
- Tacking Doctrine
- Technical Trademark Use
- The Supplemental Register
- Trade Dress
- Trade Dress Application
- Trademark Application
- Trademark Clearance Searches
- Trademark Disclaimers
- Trademark Licensing
- Trademark of Authors, Performing Artists, and Characters
- Trademark Ownership
- Trademark Protection In Texas
- Trademark Settlements
- Trademark Specimens
- Trademark Specimens
- Trademark Use by Related Company
- Trademark Use in Advertising
- Trademark Use in Commerce
- Trademarking a Distinctive Mark
- Trademarking a Hashtag
- Trademarks for Musical Artists
- TTAB Discovery Rules
- TTAB Proceedings
- U.S. Service Mark
- U.S. Trade Dress
- Understanding Trade Channels
- Unitary U.S. Trademark
- Universal Symbols as Trademarks
- Using Secondary Sources
- What is an Ex Parte Appeal?
- Where to Register a Trademark
- Who Must File a Trademark?
Additional Defenses in Trademark Cases
Additional defenses include, but are not limited to: (1) prior registration (known as the Morehouse Defense); (2) abandonment; (3) genericness; (4) functionality; (5) absence of likelihood of confusion; (6) priority; (7) lack of secondary meaning; (8) development of secondary meaning; (9) claim preclusion; (10) issue preclusion; (11) contractual estoppel; (12) license estoppel; or (13) challenging the validity of the plaintiff's registration, which requires additional action. If a party wishes to challenge the plaintiff's registration, they should assert a counterclaim or file a separate Petition to Cancel with the TTAB.
CLIENT MATTERS
5,000+
YEARS OF SERVICE
25+
Award Winning
Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.
Expert Team
Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you.
Quality Representation
