The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) is actively working to improve the accuracy of the Trademark Register by addressing marks that are no longer in use in commerce. As part of this initiative, the TTAB has introduced a pilot program called Expedited Cancellation Proceedings, aimed at expediting proceedings when nonuse or abandonment are the sole grounds alleged.
In many cases, these types of matters can be resolved before the TTAB selects them for expedited proceedings. If no Answer is filed in response to a Cancellation Petition for nonuse, a default judgment will be issued, resulting in the cancellation of the challenged registration. This typically occurs within 5-6 months from the filing of the Petition for Cancellation. However, if an Answer is filed in response to a Petition that only asserts nonuse or abandonment grounds, it is likely that the case will be chosen for an accelerated proceeding.
In theory, this mechanism appears beneficial for Petitioners seeking cancellation based on nonuse or abandonment. Starting from March 2018, the TTAB aimed to identify newly filed cancellation proceedings limited to nonuse or abandonment grounds. If a case is selected for the pilot program, an Interlocutory Attorney and an Administrative Judge will participate in the discovery conference. The conference will cover typical subjects and also explore the possibility of stipulating to certain facts and evidence, limiting discovery, and using the "summary judgment ACR" model. With the summary judgment ACR model, the Board can treat the motion as the final record and determine factual disputes.
When seeking cancellation based on abandonment, the Petitioner must establish "standing" to challenge the registration. Additionally, the Petitioner must prove a prima facie case of abandonment by a preponderance of the evidence, showing that the registrant discontinued use of the trademark with the goods or services listed in the registration and had no intent to resume use. Alternatively, if the Petitioner cannot establish this, they can present a prima facie case by demonstrating three consecutive years of nonuse in commerce. If a prima facie case is established, the burden shifts to the registrant to prove either use of the mark in commerce during the three-year period or intent to resume use through justifiable nonuse.
If the Petitioner cannot demonstrate three consecutive years of nonuse, it becomes challenging for them to prove abandonment through nonuse, as exemplified in the case of TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V. v. Jeffrey E. Martin, Cancellation No. 92068042 (December 7, 2018) [precedential]. This case was selected for the pilot program, and the parties agreed to exchange initial disclosures while forgoing typical discovery. Unfortunately, the Petitioner needed discovery to meet its burden and prove its case. The Board ruled that the Petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of nonuse and dismissed the Petition for Cancellation. As mentioned earlier, while the Expedited Cancellation Proceedings may seem helpful in theory, TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V. v. Jeffrey E. Martin highlights the difficulties Petitioners may face in meeting their burden of proof on abandonment without exceptionally strong evidence. Limited discovery can present significant obstacles in such cases.
If you need legal advice regarding your trademark rights, assistance with trademark prosecution, or representation in a domain name dispute, contact Wilson Whitaker Rynell. Our team of trademark lawyers has extensive experience in all aspects of trademark and copyright law, including the filing of trademark applications and representing clients in defense or prosecution before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Getting in touch is easy. Use the form below and request a free consultation today.
Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.
Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you.
Let's talk about your legal issue
Wilson Legal Group P.C.
d/b/a Wilson Whitaker Rynell
(972) 248-8080 (Dallas) MAIN OFFICE
(713) 830-2207 (Houston) Appointment Only
(512) 691-4100 (Austin) Appointment Only
For more information on how we can assist in your intellectual property, commercial litigation, divorce, or other personal needs, let us know how we can help you:
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Thank You for Contacting Us!
Your information has been sent, and we will contact you shorlty...issues.
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Oops, there was an error sending your message.
Please try again later.
Disclaimer:
This form does not establish an attorney-client relationship, and should only be used to contact the firm about scheduling a call or meeting. No confidential or sensitive information should be sent using this form.
We represent clients nationwide, including Dallas, Austin, Houston, and other Texas areas such as Fort Worth, Arlington, Carrollton, Plano, Allen, Lewisville, Flower Mound, Irving, Denton, McKinney, North Richland Hills, and all cities within Dallas County, Tarrant County, Collin County, and Denton County.
Wilson Whitaker Rynell
16610 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75248
972-248-8080 (MAIN)
972-248-8088 (FAX)
info@wrrlegal.com (E-MAIL)