There are instances when a trademark practitioner may need to advise a client to abandon a trademark application or withdraw from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) proceeding. One such situation arises when a trademark applicant seeks legal counsel after filing an application without conducting a trademark clearance search. In such cases, if the application is opposed by a third party alleging a likelihood of confusion with their registered trademark and they have senior rights, it may be advisable to abandon the application. However, there can be negative consequences associated with this course of action.
Typically, a trademark applicant can abandon their rights in an application by filing an express abandonment. However, if the applicant chooses to abandon the application after an opposition, concurrent use proceeding, or interference has commenced, they must obtain written consent from every adverse party. Failure to do so may result in a judgment being entered against the applicant. Additional information on this circumstance can be found in 37 CFR §2.135.
Furthermore, a trademark applicant may face negative consequences if a default judgment is entered against them or if a TTAB action is dismissed "with prejudice." In either case, the applicant is barred from filing the same trademark, in the same format, for the same goods or services that were the subject of the proceeding. There are exceptions to this rule, such as if the opposing party ceases business operations or abandons their trademark.
There are also situations where a trademark practitioner may advise a client to withdraw an opposition or cancellation proceeding. For example, if a party initiates such a proceeding but discovers unfavorable facts that would harm their case, they may wish to withdraw. This can only be done without the opposing party's consent and without a dismissal with prejudice if an answer has not yet been filed. However, if an answer has been filed, the proceeding cannot be withdrawn without prejudice unless written consent is obtained from the opposing party. More information on this topic can be found in 37 CFR §2.106(c).
If an action is withdrawn without prejudice, a new proceeding can be filed against the same mark at a later time. Conversely, if the case is withdrawn or dismissed with prejudice, the plaintiff is barred from filing another proceeding (opposition or cancellation) against the specific form of the trademark for the listed goods and services in the application or registration. However, the plaintiff would not be barred if the mark was modified, such as by adding a design element, or if the goods and services were amended.
In most cases within our practice, we advise clients to explore alternative business resolutions before pursuing proceedings at the TTAB. Board proceedings have several disadvantages, including the fact that they do not consider marketplace realities or the client's specific business. The Board relies on the information within the trademark application or registration to determine the scope of goods or services and the likelihood of confusion.
It is important to note that the jurisdiction of the TTAB is limited to determining if a mark is eligible for registration and does not include awarding damages, attorney fees, or injunctions. Often, it is more practical to negotiate an amicable settlement, which requires compromise but allows both parties to continue their businesses without disruption or significant litigation costs. The settlement agreement does not need to be filed publicly; it only requires the parties to file a document dismissing the action, ensuring the terms of the settlement remain confidential. It is crucial for a trademark applicant to seek legal counsel before filing an application, considering abandonment, or withdrawing from a TTAB proceeding.
If you need legal advice regarding your trademark rights, assistance with trademark prosecution, or representation in a domain name dispute, contact Wilson Whitaker Rynell. Our team of trademark lawyers has extensive experience in all aspects of trademark and copyright law, including the filing of trademark applications and representing clients in defense or prosecution before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Getting in touch is easy. Use the form below and request a free consultation today.
Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.
Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you.
Let's talk about your legal issue
Wilson Legal Group P.C.
d/b/a Wilson Whitaker Rynell
(972) 248-8080 (Dallas) MAIN OFFICE
(713) 830-2207 (Houston) Appointment Only
(512) 691-4100 (Austin) Appointment Only
For more information on how we can assist in your intellectual property, commercial litigation, divorce, or other personal needs, let us know how we can help you:
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Thank You for Contacting Us!
Your information has been sent, and we will contact you shorlty...issues.
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Oops, there was an error sending your message.
Please try again later.
Disclaimer:
This form does not establish an attorney-client relationship, and should only be used to contact the firm about scheduling a call or meeting. No confidential or sensitive information should be sent using this form.
We represent clients nationwide, including Dallas, Austin, Houston, and other Texas areas such as Fort Worth, Arlington, Carrollton, Plano, Allen, Lewisville, Flower Mound, Irving, Denton, McKinney, North Richland Hills, and all cities within Dallas County, Tarrant County, Collin County, and Denton County.
Wilson Whitaker Rynell
16610 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75248
972-248-8080 (MAIN)
972-248-8088 (FAX)
info@wrrlegal.com (E-MAIL)