It is possible for goods within the same international class to claim different bases, such as a use basis under §1(a) or an intent-to-use basis under §1(b) of the Trademark Act. For instance, if a jeweler currently sells earrings under their brand but is also planning to sell bracelets under the same brand, the earrings can claim a use basis while the bracelets can claim an intent-to-use basis. This approach eliminates the need for separate trademark applications and takes advantage of the filing date as a constructive use date.
When an applicant asserts both use and intent-to-use for goods and services in a single trademark application, the application will be published, and a Notice of Allowance will be issued after examination. Goods with a use basis will remain in the application and wait for the applicant to file a Statement of Use. However, this approach may result in a delay for the goods or services claiming a use basis until the Statement of Use is filed for the other goods and services. Some applicants may choose to divide the application to allow the goods and services claiming use to proceed to registration, although this incurs additional fees.
Another possibility is when an applicant asserts a §44 basis and also claims either a use in commerce under §1(a) or a bona fide intent-to-use under §1(b) for identical goods and services. While an applicant can assert both a use basis and an intent-to-use basis in one application, they cannot be claimed for the same goods or services. It's important for applicants to be aware that failure to respond to an Office Action or Notice of Allowance related to one of the two bases will result in the abandonment of the entire trademark application.
If an applicant claims priority under §44(d) and also asserts a use or intent-to-use basis, they can choose not to perfect the §44(e) basis and still maintain the priority filing basis. Typically, an Examining Attorney will inquire whether the applicant wishes to retain the §44(e) basis as a secondary basis. If the applicant chooses to keep the §44(e) basis, the Examiner cannot publish the application for opposition or register the mark on the Supplemental Register without a copy of the foreign registration.
An applicant has the option to amend the application to add or substitute a basis as long as it is done before the application is approved for publication. However, if the amendment to add or substitute a basis is made after publication, it must be done through a petition to the Director. If the petition is granted by the Director and the Examiner accepts the new basis, the application must be republished. It is important to note that once an applicant starts using the mark in commerce after the filing date, §1(a) cannot be added or substituted as a basis at any point in the prosecution.
If you need legal advice regarding your trademark rights, assistance with trademark prosecution, or representation in a domain name dispute, contact Wilson Whitaker Rynell. Our team of trademark lawyers has extensive experience in all aspects of trademark and copyright law, including the filing of trademark applications and representing clients in defense or prosecution before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Getting in touch is easy. Use the form below and request a free consultation today.
Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.
Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you.
Let's talk about your legal issue
Wilson Legal Group P.C.
d/b/a Wilson Whitaker Rynell
(972) 248-8080 (Dallas) MAIN OFFICE
(713) 830-2207 (Houston) Appointment Only
(512) 691-4100 (Austin) Appointment Only
For more information on how we can assist in your intellectual property, commercial litigation, divorce, or other personal needs, let us know how we can help you:
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Thank You for Contacting Us!
Your information has been sent, and we will contact you shorlty...issues.
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Oops, there was an error sending your message.
Please try again later.
Disclaimer:
This form does not establish an attorney-client relationship, and should only be used to contact the firm about scheduling a call or meeting. No confidential or sensitive information should be sent using this form.
We represent clients nationwide, including Dallas, Austin, Houston, and other Texas areas such as Fort Worth, Arlington, Carrollton, Plano, Allen, Lewisville, Flower Mound, Irving, Denton, McKinney, North Richland Hills, and all cities within Dallas County, Tarrant County, Collin County, and Denton County.
Wilson Whitaker Rynell
16610 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75248
972-248-8080 (MAIN)
972-248-8088 (FAX)
info@wrrlegal.com (E-MAIL)