The United States Patent & Trademark Office ("USPTO") maintains two registers: the Principal Register and the Supplemental Register, as defined by the Trademark Act. Ideally, applicants should strive to have their mark registered on the Principal Register, as it offers all the advantages of federal registration. On the other hand, the Supplemental Register provides limited benefits and a narrower scope of protection. Notably, a mark on the Supplemental Register does NOT serve as prima facie evidence of registration validity or ownership, nor does it grant an exclusive right to nationwide use of the mark in commerce. These limitations can make it challenging to establish proprietary ownership of a distinctive mark in court.
In most cases, applicants will file their applications for the Principal Register. However, issues may arise if the mark is refused due to it being merely descriptive of the goods and/or services listed in the application, especially if the filing basis is intent-to-use. If the refusal cannot be overcome, the applicant may need to amend the application to the Supplemental Register. However, amending to the Supplemental Register is only possible after lawful use in commerce has occurred. This means that an acceptable Allegation of Use or Statement of Use must be filed by the applicant before the application can be transferred to the Supplemental Register, as explained in the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure ("TMEP") §816.02.
Nevertheless, transferring an intent-to-use application to the Supplemental Register can have two significant negative implications. Firstly, the filing date will change. The USPTO will now consider the filing date of the amendment to allege use as the effective filing date (and the effective constructive use date). This is because the minimum filing requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.76(e) are not met until an Allegation of Use or Statement of Use is submitted. The new filing date can have a critical adverse impact if the applicant relied on the original filing date to establish priority over another trademark owner. Under such circumstances, the applicant may potentially lose priority rights and jeopardize their trademark rights in a dispute.
Secondly, amending an intent-to-use application to the Supplemental Register requires a second conflict search of the Trademark Office database based on the later application filing date. This can have serious consequences for the applicant. If a new mark was filed between the original filing date and the later filing date, and if it is deemed confusingly similar to the applicant's mark, the applicant's mark will be suspended pending resolution of the earlier filed application. The suspension will only be lifted if the confusingly similar mark fails to obtain registration. Therefore, the applicant may be unable to register their mark under such circumstances.
It's worth noting that amending a trademark application from the Supplemental to the Principal Register does not alter the effective filing date. There are no limitations on the number of times an applicant can switch registers through amendments. In most trademark prosecutions, a single amendment is typically sufficient.
If an intent-to-use applicant intends to transfer to the Supplemental Register but has not yet filed the Allegation of Use, even if an alternative filing basis exists, the entire application will still face refusal unless certain actions are taken. The applicant must either delete the 1(b) basis or divide the application. For specific information on dividing an application, please refer to TMEP §§1110-1110.12. Amending applications to the Supplemental Register can involve intricacies, and it is advisable for applicants to consult an experienced trademark attorney before proceeding with the transfer.
If you need legal advice regarding your trademark rights, assistance with trademark prosecution, or representation in a domain name dispute, contact Wilson Whitaker Rynell. Our team of trademark lawyers has extensive experience in all aspects of trademark and copyright law, including the filing of trademark applications and representing clients in defense or prosecution before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Getting in touch is easy. Use the form below and request a free consultation today.
Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.
Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you.
Let's talk about your legal issue
Wilson Legal Group P.C.
d/b/a Wilson Whitaker Rynell
(972) 248-8080 (Dallas) MAIN OFFICE
(713) 830-2207 (Houston) Appointment Only
(512) 691-4100 (Austin) Appointment Only
For more information on how we can assist in your intellectual property, commercial litigation, divorce, or other personal needs, let us know how we can help you:
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Thank You for Contacting Us!
Your information has been sent, and we will contact you shorlty...issues.
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Oops, there was an error sending your message.
Please try again later.
Disclaimer:
This form does not establish an attorney-client relationship, and should only be used to contact the firm about scheduling a call or meeting. No confidential or sensitive information should be sent using this form.
We represent clients nationwide, including Dallas, Austin, Houston, and other Texas areas such as Fort Worth, Arlington, Carrollton, Plano, Allen, Lewisville, Flower Mound, Irving, Denton, McKinney, North Richland Hills, and all cities within Dallas County, Tarrant County, Collin County, and Denton County.
Wilson Whitaker Rynell
16610 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75248
972-248-8080 (MAIN)
972-248-8088 (FAX)
info@wrrlegal.com (E-MAIL)