While Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board or TTAB) proceedings are generally shorter and less expensive than litigation in federal court, they still have a minimum duration of 18 months and can be quite costly. For more information about Board proceedings, please refer to our firm's page on Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Proceedings. It's important to note that most Board proceedings experience extensions or suspensions for various reasons such as settlement discussions or motion practice. As a result, the entire process from initiation to final decision typically takes an average of 3 years or more to complete. Due to the financial burden associated with these proceedings, most parties find them financially challenging. Statistics indicate that only around 2-3 percent of cases each year receive a final decision on the merits. Recognizing the lengthy duration and high costs involved, the Board has explored proposals from stakeholders to handle these matters more efficiently. Ultimately, the Board has introduced Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR) as a cost-effective option for parties involved in Board proceedings. ACR offers a streamlined and economical alternative to traditional discovery, trial, and briefing.
ACR applies to both opposition and cancellation proceedings and is available in all cases. In every ACR proceeding, there will be pleadings and an Institution Order issued by the Board. Cases that are most suitable for ACR are those requiring minimal discovery, cases where parties can stipulate to many facts, cases with few anticipated witnesses, cases where parties agree to use summary judgment submissions, and cases where parties agree to have the Board resolve disputes regarding material facts. Additionally, the parties should anticipate being able to stipulate to the admissibility of the majority of the record. Any objections to specific items of evidence can be raised based on relevance or weight in the final briefs or summary judgment submissions. It is important to note that the Board's decision in an ACR proceeding is final and subject to judicial review.
To explore different options for ACR, it may be beneficial to request the participation of the Interlocutory Attorney in the discovery/settlement conference. During the conference, the parties need to discuss the duration of discovery and any restrictions that will be imposed on this phase of the proceeding. In certain cases, parties may proceed with the typical discovery phase but then opt for an ACR trial phase. The parties must present the ACR agreement or stipulation in writing to the assigned Interlocutory Attorney, and it is within the Board's discretion to accept or reject the parties' proposal for resolving the case according to the presented ACR schedule. Currently, ACR is only permitted with the consent of the parties and the agreement of the Board; it cannot be approved unilaterally by one party through motion.
The more issues the parties can agree to stipulate, the greater the cost savings in the process. Parties can agree to forgo pretrial disclosures and reach consensus on certain substantive issues. For example, if the parties agree that there is a likelihood of confusion between the sources of the marks but disagree on priority, they can allow the Board to settle that specific issue, resulting in significant savings during the discovery, trial, and briefing phases. Parties can also agree to waive depositions, leading to additional cost savings.
Often, parties will consent to presenting direct testimony through affidavits or declarations to reduce costs. The standards of proof remain the same in ACR proceedings, requiring the plaintiff to establish its case by a preponderance of the evidence. Lastly, it is possible for a party to initially agree to ACR but later change their mind, for example, if the parties cannot agree on stipulated facts. Additionally, at some point during the proceedings, the Board may determine that due to disagreements between the parties or extensive motion practice, the case is no longer suitable for resolution through ACR.
If you need legal advice regarding your trademark rights, assistance with trademark prosecution, or representation in a domain name dispute, contact Wilson Whitaker Rynell. Our team of trademark lawyers has extensive experience in all aspects of trademark and copyright law, including the filing of trademark applications and representing clients in defense or prosecution before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Getting in touch is easy. Use the form below and request a free consultation today.
Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.
Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you.
Let's talk about your legal issue
Wilson Legal Group P.C.
d/b/a Wilson Whitaker Rynell
(972) 248-8080 (Dallas) MAIN OFFICE
(713) 830-2207 (Houston) Appointment Only
(512) 691-4100 (Austin) Appointment Only
For more information on how we can assist in your intellectual property, commercial litigation, divorce, or other personal needs, let us know how we can help you:
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Thank You for Contacting Us!
Your information has been sent, and we will contact you shorlty...issues.
WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL
Oops, there was an error sending your message.
Please try again later.
Disclaimer:
This form does not establish an attorney-client relationship, and should only be used to contact the firm about scheduling a call or meeting. No confidential or sensitive information should be sent using this form.
We represent clients nationwide, including Dallas, Austin, Houston, and other Texas areas such as Fort Worth, Arlington, Carrollton, Plano, Allen, Lewisville, Flower Mound, Irving, Denton, McKinney, North Richland Hills, and all cities within Dallas County, Tarrant County, Collin County, and Denton County.
Wilson Whitaker Rynell
16610 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75248
972-248-8080 (MAIN)
972-248-8088 (FAX)
info@wrrlegal.com (E-MAIL)