Wilson Whitaker Rynell

Experienced Lawyers

info@wwrlegal.com

a blue and orange check mark with the letter w on it as the Wilson Whitaker Rynell Logo
972-248-8080 DALLAS
713-830-2207 HOUSTON
512-691-4100 AUSTIN
wilson whitaker rynell attorneys and counselors at law logo
972-248-8080 DALLAS
713-830-2207 HOUSTON
512-691-4100 AUSTIN

DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES & LITIGATION ATTORNEYS, DALLAS, TEXAS.

Our IP attorneys prosecute and defend Cybersquatting and domain name disputes in federal and state court, as well as administering complaints through the UDRP.

DOMAIN NAME LITIGATION AND UNIFORM DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (UDRP)

What is a Domain Name Dispute? 

A domain name dispute arises when two or more parties each believe they each have the right to register or use a specific domain name. Most domain name disputes occur when a domain name is filed or registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that is similar to another trademark owner.   Our IP trial attorneys represent plaintiffs and defendants in various types of trademark litigation, domain name litigation, and domain name disputes. 


What is Cyber-Squatting? 

Cyber-Squatting is the practice of registering names, especially well-known company or brand names, as Internet domains, hoping to resell them as a profit. The Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) established a cause of action for registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name confusingly similar to, or dilutive of, a trademark or personal name.  Suppose a domain squatter blocks the rightful owner of a trademark or brand from acquiring the domain name or creates domain names that are confusingly similar to that of the rightful owner of a trademark or brand. In that case, the law provides specifics legal remedies. The ACPA is codified in federal statutes as part of trademark law.  Our lawyers represent plaintiffs and defendants in intellectual property litigation in federal and state courts. 


Domain Name Litigation and the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)


Domain name disputes can be resolved in federal or state court by filing a domain name litigation lawsuit and/or by filing a trademark opposition or trademark petition to cancel in the USTPO in the event the domain is being registered as a trademark.   Another option is to use the international arbitration system established by the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to request the transfer of the domain name to you. The ICANN international policy for resolving domain name disputes is known as the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). All domain name registrars must follow the ICANN's Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP). Our domain name litigation attorneys have experience prosecuting and defending domain disputes in court and arbitration.


While the UDRP does not directly prohibit anticipatory cybersquatting, it is the most expedient means of removing offending domain names from anticipatory and actual cybersquatters. Unlike the ACPA, the UDRP does not require that the protected domain name or trademark be distinctive or famous at the time of registration. 


Dallas Domain Name Litigation and Cyber Squatting Lawyers

Our Dallas domain name and cyber-squatting litigation attorneys have earned a reputation for aggressive, responsive, efficient, and most importantly, successful litigation. While we are prepared to take every case to trial, we know from our clients' perspective that often, the best litigation is the one that settles in mediation. Our straight forward unbiased guidance can help you avoid litigation whenever possible. However, if needed, our litigators are skilled in negotiation techniques and have a reputation for achieving very favorable results for our clients both in-court and out-of-court. 

a blue and orange check mark with the letter w on it for Wilson Legal Group Logo

Additional Domain Name Litigation Focus 

What is the Anti-Cyber Squatting Consumer Protection Act?

The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) is federal legislation that established a legal cause of action for registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name confusingly similar to, or dilutive of, a trademark or personal name. Under the ACPA, a trademark owner may bring a federal cause of action against a domain name registrant who, with bad faith intent to profit off a mark, registers, traffics in, or uses a domain that is:

 

  • identical or confusingly similar to a distinctive mark;

 

  • identical or confusingly similar to or dilutive of a famous mark; and

 

  • is a protected trademark 18 U.S.C. § 706 (Red Cross) or 36 U.S.C. § 220506 (Olympics).

 

In determining whether the domain name registrant has a bad faith intent to profit, courts consider a wide breadth of factors; however, the statute outlines the following nine elements to distinguish abusive domain name registrations from legitimate ones:

 

  • the trademark or other intellectual property rights of the person, if any, in the domain name;

 

  • the extent to which the domain name consists of the legal name of the person or a name that is otherwise commonly used to identify that person;

 

  • the person's prior use, if any, of the domain name in connection with the bona fide offering of any goods or services;

 

  • the person's bona fide noncommercial or fair use of the mark in a site accessible under the domain name;

 

  • the person's intent to divert consumers from the mark owner's online location to a site accessible under the domain name that could harm the goodwill represented by the mark, either for commercial gain or with the intent to tarnish or disparage the mark, by creating a likelihood of confusion as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the site;

 

  • the person's offer to transfer, sell, or otherwise assign the domain name to the mark owner or any third party for financial gain without having used, or having an intent to use, the domain name in the bona fide offering of any goods or services, or the person's prior conduct indicating a pattern of such conduct;

 

  • the person's provision of material and misleading, false contact information, when applying for the registration of the domain name, the person's intentional failure to maintain accurate contact information, or the person's prior conduct indicating a pattern of such conduct;

 

  • the person's registration or acquisition of multiple domain names which the person knows are identical or confusingly similar to marks of others that are distinctive at the time of the registration of such domain names, or dilutive of famous marks of others that are famous at the time of registration of such domain names, without regard to the goods or services of the parties; and

 

  • the extent to which the mark incorporated in the person's domain name registration is or is not distinctive and famous.

 

CLIENT MATTERS


5,000+


YEARS OF SERVICE

 25+

Award Winning

Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.

Expert Team

Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you. 

Quality Representation

You’ll find the support you need to ensure that things run smoothly. We’re here to help with all your legal needs.

Meet Our Team

View All
A man riding a horse with a bull behind him
By John Wilson January 23, 2025
Understanding Writs of Execution in Texas: A Layperson’s Guide If a court determines that someone owes money to another party, the debtor—referred to as the "judgment debtor"—typically has 30 days to pay off the debt. If the debt remains unpaid after this time, the creditor, or "judgment creditor," can take legal action to enforce the payment through a Writ of Execution . This legal process, governed by Texas law, enables creditors to collect what they are owed by seizing and selling the debtor’s non-exempt assets. What Is a Writ of Execution? Under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 629 , a Writ of Execution is a court order that authorizes a sheriff or constable to seize the debtor’s property to satisfy the debt. This writ is an essential tool for creditors when voluntary repayment has not occurred. Once the writ is issued, it is handed over to a county constable or sheriff, who is required to act “without delay” in collecting the debtor’s real and personal property. The seized property is then sold, and the proceeds are used to pay off the debt. If multiple writs are filed against the same debtor, the assets are distributed in the order the writs were received. What Property Can Be Seized Under a Writ of Execution? Texas law is very specific about which types of property can and cannot be seized to satisfy a judgment. Exempt Property Certain assets are protected from seizure under Texas Property Code § 41.001. These include: The debtor’s homestead (primary residence) Wages earned from employment Professionally prescribed health aids Workers’ compensation benefits College savings plans Some insurance benefits Personal property valued up to $50,000 for individuals and $100,000 for families Unique to Texas, the law also protects items like family Bibles, two firearms, pets, and for rural residents, livestock (e.g., 12 head of cattle and 120 fowl). This extensive list reflects Texas's cultural heritage and values. Non-Exempt Property Assets that are generally not exempt include: Vacation homes Timeshares Pleasure boats Airplanes Jewelry exceeding certain value thresholds The specific procedures for seizing different types of property are detailed in Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 639 . Can a Writ of Execution Be Avoided? Judgment debtors have a few options to avoid the execution of a writ: Filing a Supersedeas Bond A supersedeas bond can temporarily halt enforcement of the writ. This bond, filed with the county clerk or justice of the peace, preserves the status quo while the debtor seeks further legal remedies. This option is governed by Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 634 . Challenging the Execution Debtors can file a claim for wrongful execution in situations such as: The debt has already been paid Exempt property is being seized The levy is excessive Additionally, courts take extra care to protect property classified as a homestead under Texas Property Code § 41.002(c) . When only one spouse is responsible for the debt, Texas Family Code § 3.202(a) and related provisions provide guidance on levying against community or separate property. The Role of County Officials in Executing the Writ Once the writ is issued, its enforcement falls on county officials, typically a sheriff or constable. These officials must act in accordance with Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , which requires them to execute the writ and report back to the court. They must: Give proper notice of the sale of seized property Ensure the proceeds are appropriately delivered to the creditor Avoid overstepping legal boundaries, such as seizing exempt property Failing to execute the writ properly can result in serious consequences, where a sheriff’s refusal to levy on a property initially listed as exempt (but later deemed abandoned) led to court action and damages awarded to the creditor. Preventing Fraudulent Transfers One challenge creditors face is when debtors attempt to hide or transfer assets to avoid collection. To address this, Texas follows the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act under Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code § 24.001 et seq .. This act provides legal remedies to creditors when a debtor’s transfer of assets is deemed fraudulent. Effect of a Defendant's Death on Writs of Execution Under Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , the death of a defendant after a writ of execution is issued halts execution proceedings. However, any lien acquired from the writ's levy is still enforceable by the county court when paying off the deceased's debts. Why Proper Execution Of The Writ Is Crucial The rules for filing and serving a Writ of Execution are strict and detailed. Missteps, such as filing the writ in the wrong county, failing to serve the proper parties, or missing key deadlines, can lead to delays or even render the writ ineffective. Both creditors and debtors must ensure compliance with these rules to avoid unnecessary complications. For creditors, failure to properly enforce the writ could mean losing the opportunity to collect on a judgment. For debtors, not responding appropriately to a writ could result in the loss of valuable assets, even those that might have been exempt.
A sign that says jct 17 texas on it
By John Wilson January 17, 2025
Understanding Venue Selection and Motions to Dismiss in Texas Civil Litigation
A man and a woman are holding a sign that says `` our first home ''.
By John Wilson January 17, 2025
Wraparound Mortgages in Texas and The Pros and Cons of Seller Financing
Show More
Share by: