Wilson Whitaker Rynell

Experienced Lawyers

info@wwrlegal.com

a blue and orange check mark with the letter w on it as the Wilson Whitaker Rynell Logo
972-248-8080 DALLAS
713-830-2207 HOUSTON
512-691-4100 AUSTIN
wilson whitaker rynell attorneys and counselors at law logo
972-248-8080 DALLAS
713-830-2207 HOUSTON
512-691-4100 AUSTIN
a blue and orange check mark with the letter w on it as the Wilson Whitaker Rynell Logo

CASE Act and Copyright Law

John Wilson • Mar 21, 2022

Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act (“CASE Act”)

a man in a suit and tie is pointing at the camera .

Congress passed the Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act (“CASE Act”), which directed the U.S. Copyright Office to establish the Copyrights Claims Board (CCB), a voluntary, alternative tribunal to the district court for copyright owners to resolve disputes valued under $30,000. The CCB board established by the CASE Act provides a voluntary, alternative forum to federal court for parties to seek resolution of copyright disputes that have a low economic value. The CCB is the equivalent of a small claims court for copyright claims.

 

The CCB does not displace or limit the ability to bring small copyright claims in federal court; however, it creates a new accessible venue for smaller copyright claimants who want to avoid the cost of traditional copyright infringement litigation. The CCB can adjudicate copyright infringement claims, declarations of non-infringement, and misrepresentation claims under section 512(f) of the Copyright Act. Participation in the CCB is completely voluntary for all parties.

Impact of the Copyrights Claims Board (CCB) on Copyrights

The impact of CCB rulings while binding on the voluntary parties’ does not create precedential ruling in the traditional litigation sense. The CASE Act required the U.S. Copyright office to form and commence operations under the CCB on or before December 27, 2021.CCB will take a more liberal approach to copyright infringement by allowing litigation to occur simply after a party files a completed application, a deposit, and the required fee for registration with the U.S. Copyright Office. Final registration is not necessary to commence CCB litigation.  As Congress explained, “[t]his process is intended to strike a balance between still encouraging timely registration of works with the promise of a higher damage’s caps [in federal court] with the reality that smaller creators may have numerous understandable reasons for not routinely engaging in the registration process.” H.R. Rep. No. 116-252, at 26. The CCB cannot hear a claim or counterclaim related to a copyrighted work for which the registration has been rejected.


Impact of the Copyrights Claims Board (CCB) on Copyrights

The CCB created by the CASE Act can hear one of three types of claims by copyright owners, as well as all defenses (like fair use) and counterclaims allowed in federal court:


  • Infringement of filed (but not yet registered) copyrighted works;
  • A declaration of non-infringement stating certain activity does not infringe a copyright owner’s exclusive rights;
  • Recipients of a DMCA takedown notice (or counter-notice) can challenge a notice that contains some form of misrepresentation relating to the alleged infringing activity; and
  • All Legal or equitable defenses under copyright law or that are otherwise available.


Is the CCB mandatory? 

The CCB is not mandatory and totally voluntary by each party. It is strictly for small claims involving copyright infringement when no party is seeking more than $30,000 in total relief. This includes claims of infringement, claims for declaration of noninfringement (when a party accused of infringement wants a legal statement that they are not liable for infringement), and claims regarding misrepresentations when filing a notice to take down material under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Importantly, the CCB has the ability to dismiss my claim or counterclaim before making a final determination for one or more of the following reasons:


  • A claimant does not provide appropriate notice to the opposing party;
  • A claimant unjustifiably misses one or more deadlines;
  • An opposing party opts out of participation;
  • An inability to join all necessary parties;
  • Inability to secure essential witnesses, evidence, or expert testimony; and
  • The Copyright Office refuses to register the work at issue in the case (i.e. a determination was made that the material is not copyrightable). 


What type of relief will be available through the CCB?

The CCB will be able to award up to $30,000 in total damages in any one proceeding, regardless of the number of works at issue. The CCB will be able to award either actual or statutory damages, based on what the party seeking damages requests.


For actual damages, the amount will depend on the evidence provided during the proceeding and can be up to $30,000 for a single work (though there is still a $30,000 cap overall). For statutory damages, the CCB will be able to award up to $15,000 per work. A statutory cap on damages of $7,500 per work will be placed on any work not registered within the timeframes established in section 412 of the Copyright Act.

Can the CCB issue an Injunction? 

The CCB will be able to issue an order for one party to stop engaging in certain activities when both parties consent.

Estimated Cost to File a Claim with the CCB

The Copyright Office has not yet determined the exact filing fees for the CCB. The CASE Act does require that any fee set be at least $100, but no more than the cost of filing a claim in federal district court (around $600 or so).

 

The CCB will be able to require bad faith parties to pay the other party’s reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. Generally, the cap on costs and attorneys’ fees will be $5,000, but the limit will be lowered to $2,500 if the other party is not represented by an attorney. Additionally, the CCB will be able to award a higher amount in costs and attorneys’ fees in extraordinary circumstances.

Appeals from a Decision Rendered by the CCB

Importantly, you will be able to ask the Copyright Office or a federal court to review a CCB decision. Although we suggest you seek legal advice for an appellate issue, below are some of the possible reasons an appeal may be granted:


  • The decision includes a technical mistake or a clear legal or factual error that is material to the decision;
  • If after a request for reconsideration directed to the CCB if denied, the Register of Copyrights may review the decision to see if the CCB abused its discretion when denying the request for reconsideration;
  • File a request to vacate, modify, or correct a CCB determination with a federal district court if (1) the determination was issued as a result of fraud, corruption, misrepresentation, or other misconduct, (2) the CCB exceeded its authority or failed to issue a final determination, or (3) in the case of a default or failure to prosecute, excusable neglect was the cause of the default or failure to prosecute


A man is signing a contract with a pen.
By Chelsea Lankford 16 May, 2024
Dallas, Texas Contracts Lawyer 
The tm logo is in a blue circle on a white background.
By John Wilson 14 May, 2024
Types of Trade Marks
A man and a woman are sitting on a couch with their arms crossed.
By Kayla Holderman 10 May, 2024
Dallas Family Law & Divorce Attorneys Deciding to divorce is a challenging and significant life choice. Once you've made that decision, there are many paths to consider, and Wilson Whitaker Rynell is here to help you navigate the best way forward. What distinguishes us from other Dallas family law firms is our exceptionally skilled team of family law practitioners and our commitment to delivering outstanding client-centered service. Whether through mediation or litigation, our family law attorneys in Dallas bring a depth and breadth of knowledge gained through years of successful practice. We also have board certified divorce lawyers so you can count on the highest standards of integrity, expertise, and legal proficiency from the divorce lawyers at Wilson Whitaker Rynell. Whether you're in Dallas, Plano, Frisco, Allen or any other Dallas neighborhood, you can trust our local family law firm to provide you with the support and guidance of a highly experienced team of family lawyers. Family Law Practice Areas Our dedicated team is focused on providing personalized and effective legal solutions tailored to each client's unique circumstances. We understand that family law matters can be emotionally challenging, and we strive to offer compassionate support while staunchly defending our clients' rights and best interests. With Wilson Whitaker Rynell, you can trust that you'll receive top-tier legal representation from a team that genuinely prioritizes your well-being. We specialize in a wide range of family law and divorce matters, ensuring comprehensive legal support for our clients. Our experience includes, but is not limited to, the following areas:
A man in a pink sweater is wearing a virtual reality headset.
By John Wilson 09 May, 2024
Understanding the Requirements for Patent Utility, Novelty, and Non-obviousness
A woman is sitting at a desk using a laptop computer.
By Chelsea Lankford 08 May, 2024
Interview of a Child in Chambers by a Texas Court Divorces can be messy; even more so when children are involved. One pivotal question that is often asked is who will receive primary custody. The prospect of children speaking to a judge during a divorce case to help determine custody can be a controversial topic. On one hand, it aims to understand and prioritize the child's preferences and best interests. On the other hand, exposing children to legal proceedings can be emotionally taxing and stressful . When Can the Judge Talk to Children? During a nonjury trial or hearing, the court is required to privately interview any child 12 years or older, while interviewing a child under 12 is at the judge's discretion. This private interview helps convey the child's wishes regarding who should have primary custody. The judge can also conduct the interview independently or on the request of a party, amicus attorney, or attorney ad litem. While speaking to the child can help determine issues of possession, access, and parent-child relationships, it does not restrict the court’s authority to decide what’s best for them. However, in cases where a jury trial is underway, the judge is prohibited from privately interviewing the child on matters subject to a jury verdict such as which parent is granted conservatorship/primary custody. During the conversations, attorneys representing the parents, the amicus attorney, the guardian ad litem, or the child's attorney ad litem may be present. For children aged 12 and older, the court is required to record these interviews to ensure a thorough and accurate record is available as part of the overall case documentation. Inside the Judge's Playbook: What Gets Asked? The judge may ask open-ended questions about living arrangements, the child's relationship with each parent, and other aspects relevant to their well-being. Additionally, an interviewer’s nonverbal communication may not contribute to the making of a particular statement. James v. Texas DHS, 836 S.W.2d 236, 239-241, (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1992, no writ.). However, the child's testimony is just one piece of the puzzle, weighed alongside other factors such as parental behavior, home stability, and each parent's willingness to cultivate the child's relationship with the other parent. Importantly, if the judge during the interview has reasonable cause to believe that a child’s physical or mental health or welfare has been adversely affected by abuse or neglect by any person , the the judge is obligated to shall immediately make a report. Tex. Fam. Code §261.101(a).
A yellow background with the words `` open for business '' written on it.
By John Wilson 06 May, 2024
What is a Franchise Agreement? Businesses form franchise agreements when they want to share their business ideas and ventures with other entrepreneurs looking to be independent business operators themselves. The franchise agreement is a legal contract that establishes a franchisor-franchisee relationship to expand the franchisor's entrepreneurial ideas and values. The franchisor grants the franchisee the legal right to set up and operate a franchised business consistent with the terms of the franchise agreement. Under this agreement, the franchisee gains the license to use the franchisor’s trademarks, trade dress, business systems, operational manuals, and supply sources for offering and selling the franchisor's specified products and/or services. The franchise agreement is required to be legally included as an exhibit in the franchisor’s Franchise Disclosure Document, which must be presented to potential franchisees before any franchise offerings or sales are made. The federal trade commission publishes A Consumer's Guide to Buying a Franchise which is helpful for perspective purchasers' of franchises.
An elderly man in a suit and tie is giving two thumbs up.
By Kayla Holderman 25 Apr, 2024
New FTC Rule Bans Noncompete Agreements in Employment Contracts
An american flag is flying in front of a large building.
By Kayla Holderman 25 Apr, 2024
Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) Form - New Filing Requirements for Legal Entities
A little girl is sitting on a rope swing.
By Chelsea Lankford 18 Apr, 2024
Parental Alienation | Texas Child Custody Attorneys
Show More
The Wilson Legal Group are Dallas attorneys that specializes in Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Trade Secrets, Complex Litigation, Business/Corporate Law, Family Law and Real Estate Law. At the Wilson Legal Group, our clients are our focus. Our philosophy is simple and straight-forward: Understand our clients' needs, hopes, and interests in order to help them flourish. Our staff strives to build strong relationships with our clients in order to appreciate their best interests and help them achieve their goals.

Request A Blog?

Have an idea for a blog?  Click and request a blog and we will let you know when we post it!

Share by: