What is Scène à faire?

"Scène à faire" is a French term used in copyright law to describe a scene, theme, or element in creative works that is considered necessary for the genre. The concept acknowledges that certain elements are standard or customary for particular genres and are therefore not subject to copyright protection. For example, in a detective novel, a scene where the detective gathers all suspects and reveals the murderer can be considered a "scène à faire" because it's a standard element of the mystery genre. The term is often used in legal contexts to argue that certain elements of a work cannot be copyrighted because they are standard in the genre and not original to any specific author. This can be crucial in copyright infringement cases, where the defendant might argue that the similarities between their work and another's are just "scène à faire" elements typical of the genre, and thus not a violation of copyright.

What is idea/expression dichotomy?

The idea/expression dichotomy is a fundamental principle in copyright law that distinguishes between ideas, which are not copyrightable, and the expression of those ideas, which are. This principle is based on the understanding that while individual expression of an idea can be protected by copyright, the underlying idea itself remains free for anyone to use. Here's a breakdown of the two components: Idea : This refers to the concept or subject matter of a work. Ideas are often broad and can include themes, concepts, principles, or methodologies. For example, the idea of a love story, the concept of time travel, or the principle of good vs. evil in storytelling are all ideas. Under copyright law, these are not protected, meaning anyone is free to create their own work based on these ideas. Expression : This is how the idea is manifested and communicated. The expression of an idea can take the form of writing, music, art, or other mediums. It's the specific, tangible, and original way in which an idea is rendered. For example, a particular novel about time travel, a specific painting depicting a love story, or a unique movie script about the battle of good vs. evil. These specific expressions are what copyright law aims to protect. The dichotomy is crucial because it ensures that copyright does not stifle creativity and innovation. By preventing people from monopolizing ideas, it allows others to explore and express those same ideas in their own unique ways, leading to a diverse range of creative works in the same genre or theme. In legal disputes, distinguishing between idea and expression is often complex and central to determining whether copyright infringement has occurred.

Are Original Home Plans Protected by Copyright Law?

Kayla Holderman • December 7, 2023

Copyright Protection For House Plans

Similar to books, movies, and songs, home plans are afforded protection under federal copyright laws so long as they are original. These laws serve to prohibit any unauthorized reproduction, modification, or reuse of the plans or designs by individuals other than the copyright owner. The question then becomes, to what extent is a custom home plan protected? With only so many ways to plan or design, for example, a four-bedroom home, how has the law been shaped to avoid monopolies over home plans?

Lennar Homes of Texas Sales and Marketing, LTD., v. Perry Homes, LLC

The case of Lennar Homes of Texas Sales and Marketing, LTD., v. Perry Homes, LLC, has played a pivotal role in shaping the application of copyright law to architectural works. Specifically, the Lennar Homes case established that size and dimensions of home designs, the general layout of the home, and the overall form, look, and feel of the home are not protectable by copyright laws. The holding of this case serves as a guide for architects and designers, outlining the parameters of copyright protection in the context of custom home plans.

Originality of Home Plans as a threshold.

The court in Lennar Homes first discussed the threshold for originality of home plans. It explained that the threshold for originality is low, merely requiring independent creation by the author and at least a minimal degree of creativity. The court stated that novelty is not a prerequisite, and even a slight amount of creativity is deemed sufficient. Further, when faced with a challenge to the originality of copyrighted material, the presumption of validity can only be overcome with evidence of copying or similarly probative evidence of originality. However, the court noted that when an idea can only be expressed in a limited number of ways, copyright protection is “thin,” and a work must be “virtually identical” to infringe. Lennar Homes of Tex. Sales & Mktg., Ltd. v. Perry Homes, LLC, 117 F. Supp. 3d 913, 934 (S.D. Tex. 2015) (quoting Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entm’t, Inc., 616 F.3d 904, 913–14 (9th Cir. 2010)).

Factual Copying Of A House Plan And Substantial Similarity

The Lennar Homes court further explained that in order to prove actionable copying, a plaintiff must first show that the defendant actually used the copyrighted material to create his own work. This is known as “Factual Copying.” Once factual copying is established, the plaintiff must then show that the infringing work is substantially similar to protectable elements of the infringed work.

Factual copying, as the court explained, involves proving that the defendant used plaintiff’s copyrighted material to create their work. Substantial similarity requires a side-by-side comparison to determine if a layman would view plaintiff and defendant’s works as substantially similar.

When drafting, or having a third-party draft, custom home plans, ensure that any party involved in the creation of your custom home plans has not directly utilized copyrighted material without permission. Further, to avoid copyright infringement, confirm that your custom home plans are not substantially similar to other custom home plans such that an ordinary person would not perceive the plans as similar.

Protectable vs. Unprotectable Elements In A Copyrighted House Plan

Copyright only protects the constituent elements of a work that are original to the author. “The mere fact that a work is copyrighted does not mean that every element of the work may be protected.” Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340, 111 S.Ct. 1282, 1289, 113 L.Ed.2d 358 (1991).

Under the Copyright Act, an architectural work “includes the overall form as well as the arrangement and composition of spaces and elements in the design, but does not include individual standard features.” 17 U.S.C. § 101. Thus, standard configurations of spaces, as well as common windows, doors, and other staple building components are excluded from copyright protection. However, “individual features that ‘reflect the architect’s creativity’ are not excluded.” H.R.Rep. No. 101–735, reprinted in 1990 U.S.C.C.A.M. 6935, 6949. Accordingly, should you wish to protect your original home plans from being copied, it is best to include creative features that stray from standard arrangements and compositions and incorporate unique design elements.

House Plan Ideas/Expressions and Scènes-à-faire

The idea/expression dichotomy and scènes-à-faire both apply to architectural works. The idea/expression dichotomy provides that an author may not copyright facts or ideas, rather, only the expression of those facts or ideas. Thus, “‘[w]hen an idea can be expressed in very few ways, copyright law does not protect that expression, because doing so would confer a de facto monopoly over the idea.’” Lennar Homes of Tex. Sales & Mktg., Ltd. v. Perry Homes, LLC, 117 F. Supp. 3d 913, 934 (S.D. Tex. 2015) (quoting Kepner-Tregoe, Inc. v. Leadership Software, Inc., 12 F.3d 527, 533 (5th Cir. 1994)). The scènes-à-faire doctrine “excludes from copyright protection ‘expressions that are standard, stock or common to a particular subject matter or are dictated by external factors,’ including ‘industry demand and practice.’” Id. (quoting Eng’g Dynamics, Inc. v. Structural Software, Inc., 46 F.3d 408, 1344, 1347 (5th Cir. 1995)).

The Court in Lennar Homes explained that under the scènes-à-faire doctrine, applying it to architecture designs, standard house designs and market expectations such as features used by all architects, because of consumer demand, get no copyright protection. Id. at *939. To navigate these doctrines effectively while drafting your custom home plans, prioritize original and creative elements in your design, steering clear of commonplace features that fall under the scènes-à-faire doctrine.

What is Scène à faire?

"Scène à faire" is a French term used in copyright law to describe a scene, theme, or element in creative works that is considered necessary for the genre. The concept acknowledges that certain elements are standard or customary for particular genres and are therefore not subject to copyright protection. For example, in a detective novel, a scene where the detective gathers all suspects and reveals the murderer can be considered a "scène à faire" because it's a standard element of the mystery genre.

The term is often used in legal contexts to argue that certain elements of a work cannot be copyrighted because they are standard in the genre and not original to any specific author. This can be crucial in copyright infringement cases, where the defendant might argue that the similarities between their work and another's are just "scène à faire" elements typical of the genre, and thus not a violation of copyright.
What is idea/expression dichotomy?

The idea/expression dichotomy is a fundamental principle in copyright law that distinguishes between ideas, which are not copyrightable, and the expression of those ideas, which are. This principle is based on the understanding that while individual expression of an idea can be protected by copyright, the underlying idea itself remains free for anyone to use.

Here's a breakdown of the two components:

Idea: This refers to the concept or subject matter of a work. Ideas are often broad and can include themes, concepts, principles, or methodologies. For example, the idea of a love story, the concept of time travel, or the principle of good vs. evil in storytelling are all ideas. Under copyright law, these are not protected, meaning anyone is free to create their own work based on these ideas.

Expression: This is how the idea is manifested and communicated. The expression of an idea can take the form of writing, music, art, or other mediums. It's the specific, tangible, and original way in which an idea is rendered. For example, a particular novel about time travel, a specific painting depicting a love story, or a unique movie script about the battle of good vs. evil. These specific expressions are what copyright law aims to protect.

The dichotomy is crucial because it ensures that copyright does not stifle creativity and innovation. By preventing people from monopolizing ideas, it allows others to explore and express those same ideas in their own unique ways, leading to a diverse range of creative works in the same genre or theme. In legal disputes, distinguishing between idea and expression is often complex and central to determining whether copyright infringement has occurred.

Factors Contributing to Home Plan Copyrightability

Lot size, market conditions, market expectations, consumer demand, and external constraints, such as zoning regulations, all contribute to whether certain elements of home plans are copyrightable. As such, generally, the general layout, overall form, look and feel of a home plan are not protectable elements. Accordingly, many home plans are not copyrightable as a “whole.” Rather, as discussed above, it is the original and distinctive elements of a home plan that is copyrightable.

Planning Your Copyright In A Home Plan

Architects must balance between protecting the creative endeavors of architects and designers and acknowledging the inherent limitations posed by copyright law. The Lennar Homes case serves as a guide, explaining that while certain fundamental aspects of home plans may not be subject to copyright protection, the original and distinctive elements remain safeguarded.

As professionals in the field navigate the intricate web of copyright law, it is imperative to embrace creativity, challenge the norm, and incorporate unique design features to establish the copyrightability of custom home plans. The interplay of doctrines such as the idea/expression dichotomy and scènes-à-faire demand a nuanced approach, urging architects to prioritize originality in their designs. Importantly, the factors contributing to home plan copyrightability, including market conditions and consumer demand, further emphasize the need for a tailored and thoughtful approach. Ultimately, in the field of architectural creativity, the protection of original home plans hinges on a comprehensive understanding of legal nuances, empowering architects to weave innovation into their designs while navigating an intricate legal landscape.

Our copyright attorneys can assist in planning your copyright.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Texas Senate Passes Bill Requiring Retroactive Child Support from Date of Conception

By Chelsea Lankford • April 10, 2025

Texas Senate Passes Bill Requiring Retroactive Child Support from Date of Conception

A person is holding a cell phone in front of a book titled artificial intelligence

Copyright and Translated Content: Who Owns the Creative Rights?

By John Wilson • February 19, 2025

Copyright and Translated Content: Who Owns the Creative Rights? Understanding Copyright Law and Translation Copyright law protects creative work and bestows sole authority over the work upon the creators. For example, the owner of the work of a novel has the right over the work under the concept of the right under the copyright. Courts have found that “the degree of protection afforded by the copyright is measured by what is actually copyrightable in the publication and not by the entire publication.” See, e.g., Dorsey v. Old Sur. Life Ins. Co., 98 F.2d 872, 873 (10th Cir. 1938) (emphasis added). For translations, the situation is not very clear. Translations involve creative judgments over word translation and not the translation of mere words. Hence the knowledge about the applicability of the concept of the right over the work is essential for establishing the right over the work. For example, a Court in the Northern District of California stated that: “ the determinative question is whether Plaintiff holds a valid copyright. ” Signo Trading Intern. Ltd. v. Gordon, 535 F. Supp. 362, 363 (N.D. Cal. 1981). The Signo Trading Court dismissed Plaintiff’s infringement claims because plaintiff did not have a valid copyright as a matter of law in the translations and transliterations at issue because they lacked the “requisite originality.” Id. at 365. Can Translation Be Considered a Creative Process? The Practice of Translating Translation goes beyond the replacement of one word by the equivalent word from the source text. Translating literary work, poetry, and fiction with deeper meanings beyond the surface text is a complex, artistic process. Translating books like The Iliad, for instance, requires the practice of artistic translation to translate the emotions, thoughts, and the culture correctly. Technical Translations and Legal Translations Conversely, technical writing and texts for the law need less creativity and instead value correctness over all else. These writing forms require strict adherence to the original sense, leaving very little room for artistic interpretation. Translations for these writing forms thus typically involve less creative contribution and less potential for the work being protected by copyright. Why Is Creativity Important for Translations for Copyright? Originality when translating For a work to be subject to copyright, some creativity, however slight, is essential. Even when the translation is taken from the work, the translation also includes some creative work by the translator. This creativity can make the translation subject to copyright. A derivative work must “recast, transform[], or adapt[]” a preexisting work and “consist[] of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship.” Id. In other words, it must change or alter the pre-existing work’s content and must itself be an original work of authorship. The Supreme Court stated that “ [t]he sine qua non of copyright is originality ” and that “ [t]o qualify for copyright protection, a work must be original to the author. ” Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340, 361 (1991) at 345. “Original, as the term is used in copyright, means only that the work was independently created by the author (as opposed to copied from other works), and that it possesses at least some minimal degree of creativity.” Id. (citing 1 M. Nimmer & D. Nimmer, Copyright §§ 2.01[A], [B] (1990)). In granting a Rule 12 motion to dismiss, the Signo Trading Court held that: " It is inconceivable that anyone could copyright a single word or a commonly used short phrase, in any language. It is also inconceivable that a valid copyright could be obtained for a phonetic spelling, using standard Roman letters, of such words or phrases. Although lists of words and translations of larger works may be copyrightable, Plaintiff cannot claim credit for any of the elements which make those things copyrightable. For these reasons, Plaintiff does not hold a valid copyright on the translations or transliterations ... " Signo Trading, 535 F. Supp. at 365. The Problem of the Derivative Work However, translations are generally "derivative works" - derived from the work of another. Because of this, the owner or author of the work is generally required to agree to the translation. Translations made illegally can be held under the classification of copyright violations, even when the translator has added creative elements. Who Has the Right over the Translated Work? Employer-Commissioned Translations Ownership of the copyright for the translation work varies. If the translation is commissioned by the owner of the original work, the owner will retain the right. Even when the translator adds creativity by passing over the original emotions and thoughts, the owner will not necessarily lose the right over the translation work. In some circumstances, the translation work can be accredited by the translator without them holding the right over the work. Independent Translations If a translation is performed independently by the translator, the translator can even be identified as the co-author of the translation. Nevertheless, the author typically has the underlying copyright, restricting the translator’s right over the work. Creative Translations from the Public Domain In certain cases, a translation may be creative enough to warrant its own copyright. For example, a translator adapting a classic work or a book in the public domain into modern language may introduce enough originality to qualify for copyright protection. However, direct, word-for-word translations are typically not considered original enough to receive new copyright protection. What About Machine Translations? The Human Creativity Copyright Requirement Machine-generated translations, including those produced by platforms like OpenAI , operate through advanced algorithms that replicate language patterns rather than capture the human touch. Unlike translations crafted by human translators who often infuse cultural insight and genuine emotion into the work, OpenAI's output is rooted in statistical patterns and data. Consequently, while these translations are impressively efficient and accurate, they typically fall short of the originality required for copyright protection. This distinction underscores the human creativity requirement needed to secure a valid copyright . Ultimately, although machine-generated translations serve as powerful tools, they do not offer the same legal and creative protections as those provided by human translators. The Bottom Line: Navigating Copyright in Translations Translations occupy the middle ground under the law of the copyright. Albeit the right of the original author generally has the right under the copyright, the right under the copyright can also be claimed by the translator provided the translation is creative enough. Central considerations here include the creativity the translator has added, the nature of the work being translated, and whether the work is under the public domain. These considerations establish the right of the owner under the copyright for the translation. Why Wilson Whitaker Rynell for Your Copyright Work? At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, our professional lawyers specialize in the practice of copyright law and copyright litigation , including the complex subject matter of translation work. We can provide you with advice about the ownership of your work under the provisions of the copyright, and protect your creative property. If you are the author, the publisher, or the translator, you can rely upon the advice from our firm. Copyright Translation FAQS

A building with a sign that says law offices on it

Business Litigation Attorneys – Protecting Your Business in High-Stakes Legal Disputes

By John Wilson • February 12, 2025

Strategic Legal Representation for Complex Business Litigation

A woman wearing black and yellow boxing gloves is standing in a gym.

Female Divorce Attorneys in the Dallas-Fort Worth Area

By Leigh Whitaker • January 28, 2025

Female Divorce Attorneys in the Dallas-Fort Worth Area In many instances, divorce cases are challenging and emotionally taxing experiences. For this reason, it’s common for people to prefer working with an attorney of the same gender because they feel as though the attorney can empathize and understand their situation more. At the end of the day, the gender of your attorney may not affect the outcome of your case, but it’s important to feel as comfortable as possible while navigating through the process. At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, our experienced female divorce attorneys offer compassionate and empathetic approaches while they develop a comprehensive legal strategy to represent you. Why Should You Choose a Female Divorce Lawyer? There are many reasons why hiring a female divorce attorney can help you throughout your divorce. For one, they often have experience working on issues that disproportionately affect women in divorce such as spousal support (alimony), child custody disputes, and asset division. Additionally, female divorce lawyers offer a unique level of empathy, understanding, and communication. As a result, many clients feel that they are more approachable and compassionate, which is beneficial when dealing with the emotional turmoil of the process. More importantly, female divorce attorneys are more familiar with how the court treats women in divorce cases and use this knowledge to strategically protect their clients’ interests, whether male or female. Why Our Female Divorce Attorneys May be Right for You At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, our female divorce attorneys are skilled, knowledgeable professionals, they also have many years of experience in handling complex divorce cases. Whether it’s issues surrounding custody of children, alimony, or asset division, our female divorce lawyers ensure each client receives high-quality legal advice. Our firm’s female divorce attorneys provide the highest level of personal attention, ensuring that each client’s unique needs and concerns are addressed through every step. Unique Challenges Women Face in Family Law Disputes in Texas Family law disputes can be emotionally charged and legally complex, especially for women navigating the process in Texas. Women often encounter unique challenges due to their roles in the marriage and family dynamic, particularly when it comes to child custody, child support, and the division of marital assets. Child Custody Challenges In many marriages, women take on the primary caregiving role for their children. However, when it comes to custody decisions, courts in Texas prioritize the best interests of the child over parental gender. While this often works in favor of mothers, women may still face hurdles in proving they are better suited to provide the stable environment the child needs, especially if their ex-spouse disputes custody. Factors such as work schedules, living arrangements, and financial stability can come under scrutiny. Child Support Issues While Texas law allows women to seek child support, collecting these payments can sometimes prove difficult. Women awarded child support may find themselves dealing with ex-spouses who delay payments, make partial payments, or refuse to pay altogether. Enforcing child support orders often requires legal intervention, which can add to the emotional and financial strain. Division of Marital Assets In Texas, a community property state, marital assets are typically divided equitably during divorce. Women who are awarded assets such as the family home may face challenges related to maintaining the property, refinancing a mortgage, or covering associated expenses. Additionally, women who sacrificed their careers to support their spouses or raise children may feel disadvantaged during the division of assets if their earning potential is limited compared to their ex-spouse. How Your Divorce Attorney Will Support You Each divorce case is unique, and having an experienced attorney standing by you is vital. Whether you’re dividing assets, negotiating child custody, or managing other complex legal issues, the female divorce attorneys at Wilson Whitaker Rynell are here to protect the interests of you and your family. Our attorneys will take the time to understand your unique circumstances and empower you to make informed decisions that support your career, family and future. When you choose a female divorce attorney from Wilson Whitaker Rynell, you can trust that they will: Prioritize your family’s best interests. Negotiate with integrity, ensuring fairness and transparency. Clearly explain all your options and their potential outcomes. Help you create the future you want by offering trusted legal advice. Use efficient methods to minimize unnecessary costs and keep the process manageable. Navigating family law disputes requires a thorough understanding of Texas family law and strong advocacy. Women facing divorce or other family law issues are encouraged to seek an experienced family law attorney who can provide personalized guidance. A skilled lawyer can help craft a strategy that protects their rights and ensures a fair resolution. This includes representing their interests in court, negotiating settlements, and helping enforce orders such as child support or spousal maintenance.

A man riding a horse with a bull behind him

Wrangling Writs of Execution in Texas

By John Wilson • January 23, 2025

Understanding Writs of Execution in Texas: A Layperson’s Guide If a court determines that someone owes money to another party, the debtor—referred to as the "judgment debtor"—typically has 30 days to pay off the debt. If the debt remains unpaid after this time, the creditor, or "judgment creditor," can take legal action to enforce the payment through a Writ of Execution . This legal process, governed by Texas law, enables creditors to collect what they are owed by seizing and selling the debtor’s non-exempt assets. What Is a Writ of Execution? Under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 629 , a Writ of Execution is a court order that authorizes a sheriff or constable to seize the debtor’s property to satisfy the debt. This writ is an essential tool for creditors when voluntary repayment has not occurred. Once the writ is issued, it is handed over to a county constable or sheriff, who is required to act “without delay” in collecting the debtor’s real and personal property. The seized property is then sold, and the proceeds are used to pay off the debt. If multiple writs are filed against the same debtor, the assets are distributed in the order the writs were received. What Property Can Be Seized Under a Writ of Execution? Texas law is very specific about which types of property can and cannot be seized to satisfy a judgment. Exempt Property Certain assets are protected from seizure under Texas Property Code § 41.001. These include: The debtor’s homestead (primary residence) Wages earned from employment Professionally prescribed health aids Workers’ compensation benefits College savings plans Some insurance benefits Personal property valued up to $50,000 for individuals and $100,000 for families Unique to Texas, the law also protects items like family Bibles, two firearms, pets, and for rural residents, livestock (e.g., 12 head of cattle and 120 fowl). This extensive list reflects Texas's cultural heritage and values. Non-Exempt Property Assets that are generally not exempt include: Vacation homes Timeshares Pleasure boats Airplanes Jewelry exceeding certain value thresholds The specific procedures for seizing different types of property are detailed in Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 639 . Can a Writ of Execution Be Avoided? Judgment debtors have a few options to avoid the execution of a writ: Filing a Supersedeas Bond A supersedeas bond can temporarily halt enforcement of the writ. This bond, filed with the county clerk or justice of the peace, preserves the status quo while the debtor seeks further legal remedies. This option is governed by Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 634 . Challenging the Execution Debtors can file a claim for wrongful execution in situations such as: The debt has already been paid Exempt property is being seized The levy is excessive Additionally, courts take extra care to protect property classified as a homestead under Texas Property Code § 41.002(c) . When only one spouse is responsible for the debt, Texas Family Code § 3.202(a) and related provisions provide guidance on levying against community or separate property. The Role of County Officials in Executing the Writ Once the writ is issued, its enforcement falls on county officials, typically a sheriff or constable. These officials must act in accordance with Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , which requires them to execute the writ and report back to the court. They must: Give proper notice of the sale of seized property Ensure the proceeds are appropriately delivered to the creditor Avoid overstepping legal boundaries, such as seizing exempt property Failing to execute the writ properly can result in serious consequences, where a sheriff’s refusal to levy on a property initially listed as exempt (but later deemed abandoned) led to court action and damages awarded to the creditor. Preventing Fraudulent Transfers One challenge creditors face is when debtors attempt to hide or transfer assets to avoid collection. To address this, Texas follows the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act under Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code § 24.001 et seq .. This act provides legal remedies to creditors when a debtor’s transfer of assets is deemed fraudulent. Effect of a Defendant's Death on Writs of Execution Under Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , the death of a defendant after a writ of execution is issued halts execution proceedings. However, any lien acquired from the writ's levy is still enforceable by the county court when paying off the deceased's debts. Why Proper Execution Of The Writ Is Crucial The rules for filing and serving a Writ of Execution are strict and detailed. Missteps, such as filing the writ in the wrong county, failing to serve the proper parties, or missing key deadlines, can lead to delays or even render the writ ineffective. Both creditors and debtors must ensure compliance with these rules to avoid unnecessary complications. For creditors, failure to properly enforce the writ could mean losing the opportunity to collect on a judgment. For debtors, not responding appropriately to a writ could result in the loss of valuable assets, even those that might have been exempt.

The Intersection of Venue Selection & Motions to Dismiss in Texas

By John Wilson • January 17, 2025

Understanding Venue Selection and Motions to Dismiss in Texas Civil Litigation

A man and a woman are holding a sign that says `` our first home ''.

Wraparound Mortgages in Texas - Seller Home Finance

By John Wilson • January 17, 2025

Wraparound Mortgages in Texas and The Pros and Cons of Seller Financing

A judge is writing on a piece of paper next to a gavel on a wooden table.

Appealing a JAMS Arbitration Judgement

By Chelsea Lankford • December 6, 2024

Appeals Through JAMS Arbitration: A Structured Approach to Review

A woman in a black hoodie is making a stop sign with her hand.

Texas Court is Halting the Corporate Transparency Act

By Kayla Holderman • December 6, 2024

How One Texas Court is Halting the Corporate Transparency Act

The Wilson Legal Group are Dallas attorneys that specializes in Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Trade Secrets, Complex Litigation, Business/Corporate Law, Family Law and Real Estate Law. At the Wilson Legal Group, our clients are our focus. Our philosophy is simple and straight-forward: Understand our clients' needs, hopes, and interests in order to help them flourish. Our staff strives to build strong relationships with our clients in order to appreciate their best interests and help them achieve their goals.

Request A Blog?

Have an idea for a blog? Click and request a blog and we will let you know when we post it!